[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: [scl.org] [CentOS-devel] Fwd: Re: bug reporting for slcs ?

While I'm fine with this, it does create a split between where most CentOS bugs are filed and where the scl-sig ones are filed. 

Perhaps an excuse to revisit unifying the bug reporting?

On Friday, November 6, 2015, Honza Horak <hhorak redhat com> wrote:
Sorry for late response, I don't think we need anything on bugs.centos.org, we already have this space:


On 11/05/2015 12:37 PM, Karanbir Singh wrote:
Do we need a SCLo specific section on bugs.centos.org- and maybe get
Honza setup as primary developer for that ?


-------- Forwarded Message --------
Subject: Re: [scl.org] bug reporting for slcs ?
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2015 11:38:03 +0100
From: Jarek Polok <Jaroslaw Polok cern ch>
Organisation: CERN
To: sclorg redhat com

Since the problem is sclo-specific [ upstream package
not affected ], submitted bug report here:


(as 'Project Buildsys' category 'general')



On 10/29/2015 04:07 PM, Jarek Polok wrote:

Where bugs for SCLo collections are to be reported ?

bugs.centos.org does not seem to have SCLo project
defined ?

We have just seen a (minor) bug in rh-ruby22 collection
(wrong shebang paths in some tools)

My understanding is that that collection is a rebuilt
of upstream RH one: in that case the bug is to be
reported to CentOS/SCLo or to RH directly ?



_ Jaroslaw_Polok __________________ CERN - IT/OIS/WLS _
_ http://cern.ch/~jpolok ________ tel_+41_22_767_1834 _
______________________________________+41_75_411_9487 _

SCLorg mailing list
SCLorg redhat com

CentOS-devel mailing list
CentOS-devel centos org

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]