[scl.org] Image naming for centos-based images

[Honza Horak]

On 10/02/2015 02:20 PM, Tomas Tomecek wrote:
> Quoting Honza Horak (2015-10-02 14:10:28)
>> Tomasi, do you happen to see any potential troubles with Variant B
>> bellow, once OSBS is used in centos? like whether something like
>> centos/mariadb:10.0 or centos/mariadb:centos7 wouldn't be problem?
>>
>> Honza
>
> I can't see any troubles.
>
> If docker/openshift accepts the name, we're fine.
>
> Does the name conform to naming policy?
 >
 > 
https://github.com/projectatomic/ContainerApplicationGenericLabels/blob/master/vendor/redhat/names.md

Variant A would be much closer to what is there, but there will be 
differences, because namespace is different and it's nonsense to use 
-rhel7 suffix for centos images.

Honza

>> On 10/02/2015 12:16 PM, Honza Horak wrote:
>>> This is a follow-up for the meeting we had yesterday and which there are
>>> minutes from at:
>>> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/env-and-stacks/2015-October/000946.html
>>>
>>>
>>> One thing that we couldn't solve without any OpenShift representative
>>> was naming scheme for the centos images, that are based on SCL packages.
>>> Those were originally called (mysql chosen as example):
>>>     openshift/mysql-55-rhel7
>>>     openshift/mysql-55-centos7
>>>
>>> the new versions are located under rhscl (RH internal registry) and
>>> centos (docker hub) namespaces (variant A):
>>>     rhscl/mariadb-100-rhel7
>>>     centos/mariadb-100-centos7
>>>
>>> What we were thinking about yesterday was this scheme (variant B):
>>>     rhscl/mariadb-100-rhel7
>>>     centos/mariadb:10.0