[scl.org] SCLo el6 packages have wrong upgrade path
kbsingh at redhat.com
Thu Oct 22 10:52:32 UTC 2015
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
On 22/10/15 06:39, Honza Horak wrote:
> So far I've just roughly looked at whether el6 SCL packages
> available at http://mirror.centos.org/centos/6/SCL/x86_64/ properly
> update to packages built in CBS, as we touched it yesterday. Long
> story short, there are packages with higher NVR than what we have
> in CBS now.
> There are basically two options here -- we may rebuild the
> problematic packages and bump release in CBS or we can document how
> to properly update using `yum distro-sync`.
> Anybody has a strong opinion about one of them?
> From my PoV, bumping&rebuilding should avoid more issues on users'
> side, because we can't be sure what happens if packages are
> combined (some from CBS and some from older repo) and depending on
> manual step won't work in 100% cases.
do we know why the versions are newer ? is the corrosponding code also
Karanbir Singh, The CentOS Project, London, UK
RH Ext. 8274455 | DID: 0044 207 009 4455
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux)
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the SCLorg