[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: [scl.org] SCLo el6 packages have wrong upgrade path



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 22/10/15 06:39, Honza Horak wrote:
> So far I've just roughly looked at whether el6 SCL packages
> available at http://mirror.centos.org/centos/6/SCL/x86_64/ properly
> update to packages built in CBS, as we touched it yesterday. Long
> story short, there are packages with higher NVR than what we have
> in CBS now.
> 
> There are basically two options here -- we may rebuild the
> problematic packages and bump release in CBS or we can document how
> to properly update using `yum distro-sync`.
> 
> Anybody has a strong opinion about one of them?
> 
> From my PoV, bumping&rebuilding should avoid more issues on users'
> side, because we can't be sure what happens if packages are
> combined (some from CBS and some from older repo) and depending on
> manual step won't work in 100% cases.
> 
> Honza

do we know why the versions are newer ? is the corrosponding code also
newer ?

- -- 
Karanbir Singh, The CentOS Project, London, UK
RH Ext. 8274455 | DID: 0044 207 009 4455
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux)

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJWKL/wAAoJEI3Oi2Mx7xbtq84H/2XSWBrrCTg7CExHk6Sgfg+O
FQuNKwhr7RPyZS94ZsHppNR208aRuX50eITW7fiExZAOtNSyUZyyjbQu0KXBID9E
hvBWWryYIfrLvGf0hU+f++dbWJo8Dk9Zse8oeaP+4Si6L3GZkIvZOl7UntBZgls4
bAubyEv2tkthR1BKmiLrjI1rnIBF7Sw04wv0n3eMKUfEvDfVghnjbKuvROOmrfl7
X04je+wJE1V1mBbX9ZhG2gF1ubF+lOLFE9N0ok5JGAfXXd7CVUTpts+SirpjQFL+
tk1dg8m3jxQpmucmMGONGZa3exvoEj/gQ3hdiANa1y2PMprvAR8cs0jfRmW9yoQ=
=irb7
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]