[scl.org] Image naming for centos-based images

[Michal Fojtik]

I think the question here is really how we will tag the ruby/python/etc
images then.
Now we deal just with centos7, so we can have centos/ruby-20 (or
centos/ruby even).
How when centos8 will be out, centos/ruby-20 will be based on centos8? What
will happen
to centos7 images? How users will know what base those images have? ;-)

On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 1:03 PM, Honza Horak <hhorak at redhat.com> wrote:

> I expect we want the centos-based images be run everywhere, not only
> centos, but on Fedora, Debian or even Windows if possible.
>
> Honza
>
> On 10/22/2015 12:31 PM, Michal Fojtik wrote:
>
>> That is good question :-)
>>
>> On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 12:27 PM, Petr Pisar <ppisar at redhat.com
>> <mailto:ppisar at redhat.com>> wrote:
>>
>>     On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 12:13:43PM +0200, Michal Fojtik wrote:
>>     > I think one of the main reason (AFAIK) we used "-rhel7" and
>> "-centos7"
>>     > suffixed for the images
>>     > was that we simply used one repository ("openshift/") and we needed
>> to have
>>     > a way to distinguish
>>     > between rhel7 and centos7 images.
>>     >
>>     > Now, when we are pushing the images to "centos/" namespace on
>> DockerHub,
>>     > this is not longer required
>>     > I think, because "centos/ruby-22-centos7" sounds just weird :-)
>>     >
>>     What will happen once centos8 is released? Do you think then executing
>>     centos8 image on centos7 or vice versa will be supported?
>>
>>     -- Petr
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> SCLorg mailing list
>> SCLorg at redhat.com
>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/sclorg
>>
>>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/sclorg/attachments/20151022/471953d9/attachment.htm>