From ant at bashton.com Mon Aug 14 11:20:40 2017 From: ant at bashton.com (Ant Kenworthy) Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2017 12:20:40 +0100 Subject: [scl.org] Rsync query for softwarecollections.org repository mirroring Message-ID: Hi, It seems that we can no longer use Rsync to mirror things from software collections. According to our logs last worked on the 14th of July. Since this time we receive "connection timeout" messages when attempting a sync. Has the ability to perform rsyncs of selected repository's been withdrawn ? Thanks -ant -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From hhorak at redhat.com Mon Aug 14 12:27:47 2017 From: hhorak at redhat.com (Honza Horak) Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2017 14:27:47 +0200 Subject: [scl.org] Rsync query for softwarecollections.org repository mirroring In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <86762a64-9cb8-bd3a-50a0-3c3cb2e9198a@redhat.com> Ant, RPMs located on softwarecollections.org were obsolete for long time, and did not receive any updates for years. You should rsync from centos repositories directly. Honza On 08/14/2017 01:20 PM, Ant Kenworthy wrote: > Hi, > > It seems that we can no longer use Rsync to mirror things from software > collections. According to our logs last worked on the 14th of July. > Since this time we receive "connection timeout" messages when attempting > a sync. > > > Has the ability to perform rsyncs of selected repository's been withdrawn ? > > > Thanks > -ant > > > _______________________________________________ > SCLorg mailing list > SCLorg at redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/sclorg > From tadej.j at nez.si Sat Aug 26 07:43:48 2017 From: tadej.j at nez.si (Tadej =?UTF-8?Q?Jane=C5=BE?=) Date: Sat, 26 Aug 2017 09:43:48 +0200 Subject: [scl.org] When will rh-postgresql94 SCL be updated in CentOS? In-Reply-To: <6f349714-e983-171d-ad01-e48a4e31d04f@redhat.com> References: <1500474888.6608.7.camel@nez.si> <6f349714-e983-171d-ad01-e48a4e31d04f@redhat.com> Message-ID: <1503733428.4044.10.camel@nez.si> Hi Honza, sorry for the late reply, I went on long holidays and the thing slipped under my radar. On Fri, 2017-07-28 at 15:36 +0200, Honza Horak wrote: > > Hi Tadej, I've just started the builds, so they should get to the > repos > in couple of next days.. Great, thanks! I've updated all my CentOS machines to 9.4.12-1.el7 successfully. > > Besides the obvious question stated in the subject, I would also > > kindly > > ask for answers to: > > 1. What is the current process of updates flowing from RHSCLs to > > Centos > > SCLs? > > jstanek and myself are now the main "rebuilders", we have some > tooling > for taking the released sources and rebuilding in cbs.centos.org, > but > it's more ad-hoc action at this point. We're working on some better > automation though. Ok, thanks for the explanation. Yes, automation wouldn't hurt ;-). > > > 2. Where does softwarecollections.org fit into the picture? > > It currently serves as a catalog of collections, we don't rsync the > packages any more, we just tell people what SCLs are available and > how > they can be enabled on RHEL and on CentOS, see for example: > https://www.softwarecollections.org/en/scls/rhscl/rh-postgresql94/ Cool. One thing I would recommend is to remove the "Related COPR projects" from the page since some people might wrongly think that the SCL is being built with COPR and/or use an old version. In case of rh-postgresql94, the latest version in COPR is 9.4.5-1.el7 built in Nov 2015. > Hope that answered your questions. Yes, it did and thanks for prompt rebuilds of rh-postgresql94 in CBS! Regards, Tadej From hhorak at redhat.com Mon Aug 28 05:38:15 2017 From: hhorak at redhat.com (Honza Horak) Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2017 07:38:15 +0200 Subject: [scl.org] When will rh-postgresql94 SCL be updated in CentOS? In-Reply-To: <1503733428.4044.10.camel@nez.si> References: <1500474888.6608.7.camel@nez.si> <6f349714-e983-171d-ad01-e48a4e31d04f@redhat.com> <1503733428.4044.10.camel@nez.si> Message-ID: On 08/26/2017 09:43 AM, Tadej Jane? wrote: > Cool. One thing I would recommend is to remove the "Related COPR > projects" from the page since some people might wrongly think that the > SCL is being built with COPR and/or use an old version. > > In case of rh-postgresql94, the latest version in COPR is 9.4.5-1.el7 > built in Nov 2015. Thanks for pointing to that, I've removed it from postgresql, but there might be others in other SCLs. So, adding Jan to CC, who was going to fix description on https://www.softwarecollections.org/ -- Jan, please, take a look at Coprs/ tab as well and remove the related coprs, since it indeed is misleading. Honza From tadej.j at nez.si Mon Aug 28 08:38:18 2017 From: tadej.j at nez.si (Tadej =?UTF-8?Q?Jane=C5=BE?=) Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2017 10:38:18 +0200 Subject: [scl.org] When will rh-postgresql94 SCL be updated in CentOS? In-Reply-To: References: <1500474888.6608.7.camel@nez.si> <6f349714-e983-171d-ad01-e48a4e31d04f@redhat.com> <1503733428.4044.10.camel@nez.si> Message-ID: <1503909498.4044.17.camel@nez.si> On Mon, 2017-08-28 at 07:38 +0200, Honza Horak wrote: > On 08/26/2017 09:43 AM, Tadej Jane? wrote: > > Cool. One thing I would recommend is to remove the "Related COPR > > projects" from the page since some people might wrongly think that > > the > > SCL is being built with COPR and/or use an old version. > > > > In case of rh-postgresql94, the latest version in COPR is 9.4.5- > > 1.el7 > > built in Nov 2015. > > Thanks for pointing to that, No problem. > I've removed it from postgresql, but there > might be others in other SCLs. Thanks for quickly fixing it! > So, adding Jan to CC, who was going to fix description on > https://www.softwarecollections.org/ -- Jan, please, take a look at > Coprs/ tab as well and remove the related coprs, since it indeed is > misleading. +1 Regards, Tadej From thomas.gerbet at enalean.com Wed Aug 30 10:05:45 2017 From: thomas.gerbet at enalean.com (Thomas Gerbet) Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2017 12:05:45 +0200 Subject: [scl.org] Update to rh-git29-git-2.9.3-3 Message-ID: Hello all, Sorry for the noise (or if it's the wrong place to ask such question) but I was wondering about the update to 2.9.3-3 since only 2.9.3-2 is available in the repository. I saw that the Git repo [1] has been updated a couple of weeks back but it looks like the build has not been triggered on CBS [2]. Regards, Thomas Gerbet. [1] https://git.centos.org/summary/?r=rpms/rh-git29-git.git [2] https://cbs.centos.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=4532 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: