[scl.org] New Collection for CentOS 7 - pidgin with Voice and Video / Skype for Business integration ?

Honza Horak hhorak at redhat.com
Wed Jan 25 18:10:08 UTC 2017

I think this is a good question for CentOS generally, I'm not sure 
whether there are some guidelines for it already, but we should have 
them, so forwarding to centos-devel. From my PoV it makes sense to keep 
CBS license-free, so I'd say we should not build things that are not 
100% clean.


On 12/02/2016 11:33 PM, Jarek Polok wrote:
> Hello all
> We are working on a software collection for our organization: pidgin
> messenger with voice/video enabled allowing for integration with
> Lync / Skype for Business IM/Voice/Video/File Transfer/Desktop
> Sharing/Conference:
> http://cern.ch/linux/docs/lyncav.shtml
> (a rather preliminary build, kind of proof of concept, packages quality
> to be improved, but rather functional ..)
> It uses the code from: https://github.com/tieto/ (patched farstream2/
> remmina/freerdp/libnice/pidgin/sipe) plus few packages from Fedora 25
> (gstreamer1/gupnp/AV codecs etc).
> We could contribute this and include in CentOS SCls (if there is some
> interest of course), however there might be a small problem here: among
> all the packages needed there is a h264 video decoder based on ffmpeg
> required for Skype for Business video stream decoding (packages: ffmpeg/
> gstreamer1-libav/gstreamer1-plugins-ugly): my understanding is that
> ffmpeg based packages were not included in Fedora/Red Hat due to
> legal/licensing reasons - and therefore I assume these would not be
> included in CentOS either, is that correct ?
> The option could be to provide all other packages and point users to
> a 3rd party repository (alike rpmfusion or nux-dextop.. etc) for h264
> decoding functionality (but still we would need to provide
> gstreamer1-plugins-ugly package which needs to be built against
> ffmpeg/gstreamer1-libav .. which could be problematic to build in
> cbs.centos.org as would require access to 3rd party repos in build
> system...)
> Is this something we could contribute ?
> I would be glad to hear your opinion.
> Best Regards
> Jarek
> _______________________________________________
> SCLorg mailing list
> SCLorg at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/sclorg

More information about the SCLorg mailing list