The biggest differences will be visible for admin, because rh-postgresql95 uses concept of Software Collections (https://www.softwarecollectio
ns.org/en/docs/) which means binaries are put into alternate directory (/opt) and user needs to run `scl` command to adjust $PATH first:
bash: psql: command not found...
$ scl enable rh-postgresql95 bash
psql: could not connect to server: No such file or directory
Also name of the service is different, rh-postgresql95 uses this name:
systemctl status rh-postgresql95-postgresql
And location of the data is different as well, by default data files are located at:
As for the feature set and usage from remote server, I don't think there are any differences, so applications won't see any difference IMO.
On 03/06/2017 12:22 PM, Aawardhan Logandan wrote:
We install it from Upstream repository.
In general what are the difference between postgresql95 and rh-postgresql95?
On Mon, Mar 6, 2017 at 3:30 PM, Honza Horak <hhorak redhat com
<mailto:hhorak redhat com>> wrote:
how do you install Postgres 9.5 in CentOS? Since it may be different
answer for the two cases bellow:
1) install from CentOS SCLo SIG repos:
yum install centos-release-scl-rh
yum install rh-postgresql95
2) install from Upstream repos:
g/pub/repos/yum/9.5/redhat/rhe l-7-x86_64/pgdg-centos95-9.5- 3.noarch.rpm
rg/pub/repos/yum/9.5/redhat/rh> el-7-x86_64/pgdg-centos95-9.5- 3.noarch.rpm
yum install postgresql95-server
On 02/28/2017 06:28 AM, Aawardhan Logandan wrote:
If my product is certified to run in Postgres 9.5 (tested in
can I claim that it will work in rh-postgresql95?
_________________SCLorg redhat com <mailto:SCLorg redhat com>
SCLorg mailing list