[scl.org] rh-python36-build alternative in rhel

[Pavel Valena]

----- Original Message -----
> From: "Pavel Valena" <pvalena at redhat.com>
> To: "Jiri Novak" <jiri.novak at ghorland.net>
> Cc: sclorg at redhat.com
> Sent: Wednesday, November 22, 2017 4:20:09 PM
> Subject: Re: [scl.org] rh-python36-build alternative in rhel
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Jiri Novak" <jiri.novak at ghorland.net>
> > To: sclorg at redhat.com
> > Sent: Wednesday, November 22, 2017 4:07:33 PM
> > Subject: Re: [scl.org] rh-python36-build alternative in rhel
> > 
> > Hi,
> > 
> > the issue is that I don't have the rh-python36-build in rhel (satellite)
> > and I didn't manage to find it on rhel site, so I assume it doesn't
> > exist and should be replaced somehow.
> > It doesn't sound right to install it via wget && rpm -i from centos.
> > Or am I wrong and it is somewhere? if yes, which repo?
> 
> I'm not sure about the repo, as AFAIR it's not shipped, so probably some
> internal compose only.
> In the meantime, you can check it here:
> 
> https://brewweb.engineering.redhat.com/brew/rpminfo?rpmID=4714375

Sorry, that's supposed you have access for it. Otherwise IDK.
Pavel


> 
> Pavel
> 
> > 
> > Dependence only on rh-python36 is not enough as it is built for python
> > 2.7 instead, the scl related macros are not working without
> > rh-python36-build
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > Gh.
> > 
> > 
> > Stefan Ring wrote:
> > > On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 2:45 PM, Jiri Novak <jiri.novak at ghorland.net>
> > > wrote:
> > >> Hello,
> > >>
> > >> I'm currently trying to port python app to use rh-python36 SCL (built
> > >> using mock+rpmbuild), I've managed to make it build correctly in the scl
> > >> paths (and using python3 for the packages that need it during build) if
> > >> I install rh-python36-build from centos to the mock root.
> > >> Is there a way to do this with rhel packages too?
> > > Do what?
> > >
> > >> The issue is that
> > >> without it,
> > > Without what?
> > >
> > >> %{scl} in specfile is not populated, with it, it's properly
> > >> set to rh-python36. Should I pass the value in different manner than in
> > >> centos? or what might I be doing wrong?
> > > I have no idea what you are trying to achieve.
> > 
>