From Fedora at FamilleCollet.com Fri Feb 9 11:56:41 2018 From: Fedora at FamilleCollet.com (Remi Collet) Date: Fri, 9 Feb 2018 12:56:41 +0100 Subject: [scl.org] sclo-php-pecl-xdebug 2.6.0 and php-pecl-mongodb 1.4.0 packages available for testing Message-ID: <2b3ee7f5-9a65-d826-df78-41f9ad09bc8b@FamilleCollet.com> Updated packages available in centos-sclo-sclo-testing For rh-php56 * sclo-php56-php-pecl-mongodb-1.4.0-1.el6 For rh-php70 * sclo-php70-php-pecl-mongodb-1.4.0-1.el6 * sclo-php70-php-pecl-xdebug-2.6.0-1.el6 For rh-php71 * sclo-php70-php-pecl-mongodb-1.4.0-1.el7 * sclo-php70-php-pecl-xdebug-2.6.0-1.el7 mongodb 1.4.0 with bug fixes and new features See upstream changelog https://pecl.php.net/package-changelog.php?package=mongodb WARNING: The mongodb extension add support for MongoDB 3.6 but drop support for MongoDB 2.4 XDebug 2.6.0 with bug fixes and new features See upstream changelog https://pecl.php.net/package-changelog.php?package=xdebug And author blog post https://derickrethans.nl/xdebug-26.html Feedback welcome. Remi. P.S. https://wiki.centos.org/SpecialInterestGroup/SCLo From hhorak at redhat.com Fri Feb 9 15:03:39 2018 From: hhorak at redhat.com (Honza Horak) Date: Fri, 9 Feb 2018 16:03:39 +0100 Subject: [scl.org] Sharing Software Collections over NFS? Message-ID: <939f2438-db5e-81b0-9181-6f5c253a9de2@redhat.com> It's been a while since I wrote an article about a cool feature that we introduced together with Software Collections packaging format, which is *the ability to share the environment on multiple machines by NFS sharing *[1]. The idea is very simple -- install Software Collections of your favorite application stack (say Python 3.6 + NodeJS 8) and mount the /opt/rh on workstations. That way you have the same environment on all machines. Now, I'd like to request some feedback -- is there anybody on the list (or outside, but you at least know about it) who uses this feature for the Software Collections packages? Please, let us know! If you can't share it publicly, just drop me a direct mail. Of course, more feedback is welcome, but even simple YES would be also cool. [1] https://developers.redhat.com/blog/2015/06/29/maintain-software-collections-easily-on-thousands-of-machines-using-scl-register/ Thanks! Honza From marek.salwerowicz at misal.pl Fri Feb 9 15:23:55 2018 From: marek.salwerowicz at misal.pl (Marek Salwerowicz) Date: Fri, 9 Feb 2018 16:23:55 +0100 Subject: [scl.org] Sharing Software Collections over NFS? In-Reply-To: <939f2438-db5e-81b0-9181-6f5c253a9de2@redhat.com> References: <939f2438-db5e-81b0-9181-6f5c253a9de2@redhat.com> Message-ID: <5f5f6188-6fc4-81a6-5f23-fb7c91581fc9@misal.pl> Hi Honza, On 09.02.2018 16:03, Honza Horak wrote: > It's been a while since I wrote an article about a cool feature that > we introduced together with Software Collections packaging format, > which is *the ability to share the environment on multiple machines by > NFS sharing *[1]. > > The idea is very simple -- install Software Collections of your > favorite application stack (say Python 3.6 + NodeJS 8) and mount the > /opt/rh on workstations. That way you have the same environment on all > machines. Sounds nice, but how about config files that are installed in /etc/opt ? Cheers, Marek > > Now, I'd like to request some feedback -- is there anybody on the list > (or outside, but you at least know about it) who uses this feature for > the Software Collections packages? > > Please, let us know! If you can't share it publicly, just drop me a > direct mail. Of course, more feedback is welcome, but even simple YES > would be also cool. > > [1] > https://developers.redhat.com/blog/2015/06/29/maintain-software-collections-easily-on-thousands-of-machines-using-scl-register/ > > Thanks! > Honza > > _______________________________________________ > SCLorg mailing list > SCLorg at redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/sclorg -- Marek Salwerowicz From hhorak at redhat.com Fri Feb 9 15:45:29 2018 From: hhorak at redhat.com (Honza Horak) Date: Fri, 9 Feb 2018 16:45:29 +0100 Subject: [scl.org] Sharing Software Collections over NFS? In-Reply-To: <5f5f6188-6fc4-81a6-5f23-fb7c91581fc9@misal.pl> References: <939f2438-db5e-81b0-9181-6f5c253a9de2@redhat.com> <5f5f6188-6fc4-81a6-5f23-fb7c91581fc9@misal.pl> Message-ID: <7e182120-95ce-f185-4d04-965fda72449b@redhat.com> On 02/09/2018 04:23 PM, Marek Salwerowicz wrote: > Hi Honza, > > On 09.02.2018 16:03, Honza Horak wrote: > >> It's been a while since I wrote an article about a cool feature that >> we introduced together with Software Collections packaging format, >> which is *the ability to share the environment on multiple machines by >> NFS sharing *[1]. >> >> The idea is very simple -- install Software Collections of your >> favorite application stack (say Python 3.6 + NodeJS 8) and mount the >> /opt/rh on workstations. That way you have the same environment on all >> machines. > > Sounds nice, but how about config files that are installed in /etc/opt ? That's tricky, yes, and it's also a reason why we don't do it for stuff like databases (data files are even more tricky). This feature is used only for dynamic languages like python, ruby, nodejs, ... Honza > Cheers, > Marek > >> >> Now, I'd like to request some feedback -- is there anybody on the list >> (or outside, but you at least know about it) who uses this feature for >> the Software Collections packages? >> >> Please, let us know! If you can't share it publicly, just drop me a >> direct mail. Of course, more feedback is welcome, but even simple YES >> would be also cool. >> >> [1] >> https://developers.redhat.com/blog/2015/06/29/maintain-software-collections-easily-on-thousands-of-machines-using-scl-register/ >> >> >> Thanks! >> Honza >> >> _______________________________________________ >> SCLorg mailing list >> SCLorg at redhat.com >> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/sclorg > From smooge at gmail.com Fri Feb 9 16:00:31 2018 From: smooge at gmail.com (Stephen John Smoogen) Date: Fri, 9 Feb 2018 11:00:31 -0500 Subject: [scl.org] Sharing Software Collections over NFS? In-Reply-To: <7e182120-95ce-f185-4d04-965fda72449b@redhat.com> References: <939f2438-db5e-81b0-9181-6f5c253a9de2@redhat.com> <5f5f6188-6fc4-81a6-5f23-fb7c91581fc9@misal.pl> <7e182120-95ce-f185-4d04-965fda72449b@redhat.com> Message-ID: I don't know if this is useful for the this, but when we were doing similar setups in the 90's we would have /nfs/stuff/os/version/arch/{etc,bin,lib,scripts} which would have readonly tools. The clients would copy them to their local etc on first setup in the OS appropriate location so that they could have a mutable version. On 9 February 2018 at 10:45, Honza Horak wrote: > On 02/09/2018 04:23 PM, Marek Salwerowicz wrote: >> >> Hi Honza, >> >> On 09.02.2018 16:03, Honza Horak wrote: >> >>> It's been a while since I wrote an article about a cool feature that we >>> introduced together with Software Collections packaging format, which is >>> *the ability to share the environment on multiple machines by NFS sharing >>> *[1]. >>> >>> The idea is very simple -- install Software Collections of your favorite >>> application stack (say Python 3.6 + NodeJS 8) and mount the /opt/rh on >>> workstations. That way you have the same environment on all machines. >> >> >> Sounds nice, but how about config files that are installed in /etc/opt ? > > > That's tricky, yes, and it's also a reason why we don't do it for stuff like > databases (data files are even more tricky). This feature is used only for > dynamic languages like python, ruby, nodejs, ... > > Honza > > >> Cheers, >> Marek >> >>> >>> Now, I'd like to request some feedback -- is there anybody on the list >>> (or outside, but you at least know about it) who uses this feature for the >>> Software Collections packages? >>> >>> Please, let us know! If you can't share it publicly, just drop me a >>> direct mail. Of course, more feedback is welcome, but even simple YES would >>> be also cool. >>> >>> [1] >>> https://developers.redhat.com/blog/2015/06/29/maintain-software-collections-easily-on-thousands-of-machines-using-scl-register/ >>> >>> Thanks! >>> Honza >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> SCLorg mailing list >>> SCLorg at redhat.com >>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/sclorg >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > SCLorg mailing list > SCLorg at redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/sclorg -- Stephen J Smoogen. From vibrysec at gmail.com Thu Feb 15 15:14:40 2018 From: vibrysec at gmail.com (Mat Vibrys) Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2018 16:14:40 +0100 Subject: [scl.org] CentOs7, devtoolset-7: libgcc_s.so.1 missing Message-ID: Hallo people. Where to look for it? in contrary, scylla's gcc-7 rpm packages do contain it. regards, Mat -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From adrian.hoehn at axa-winterthur.ch Thu Feb 15 10:32:41 2018 From: adrian.hoehn at axa-winterthur.ch (=?iso-8859-1?Q?H=F6hn_Adrian?=) Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2018 10:32:41 +0000 Subject: [scl.org] rhscl/nodejs-8-rhel7 npm: command not found Message-ID: <394677EBE71D7C4BBC0DD0330A98A87960D04418@wwfemr21.chres1.doleni.net> Hi I try to use your s2i image nodejs-8-rhel7 with the following Dockerfile config on OpenShift. FROM registry.access.redhat.com/rhscl/nodejs-8-rhel7 EXPOSE 8080 RUN npm --version But when I try to build it on the Openshift platform I get the following error: npm: command not found Can you explain me why npm cannot be found on this image and what I have to do to make it work? I expect that npm is part of a node image, not? Thanks for your support, Adrian Openshift Logfile: Pulling image registry.access.redhat.com/rhscl/nodejs-8-rhel7 ... Pulled 2/5 layers, 41% complete Pulled 3/5 layers, 63% complete Pulled 4/5 layers, 84% complete Pulled 5/5 layers, 100% complete Extracting Step 1 : FROM registry.access.redhat.com/rhscl/nodejs-8-rhel7 Trying to pull repository registry.access.redhat.com/rhscl/nodejs-8-rhel7 ... sha256:66ae3f2d4cd53e1fa232018079afe9ccb27f451d932b3a57d158609d0ecfbaa2: Pulling from registry.access.redhat.com/rhscl/nodejs-8-rhel7 9a32f102e677: Already exists b8aa42cec17a: Already exists 84fbac7bf4f5: Already exists e347f5c3e6de: Already exists d7205639c454: Already exists Digest: sha256:66ae3f2d4cd53e1fa232018079afe9ccb27f451d932b3a57d158609d0ecfbaa2 Status: Image is up to date for registry.access.redhat.com/rhscl/nodejs-8-rhel7:latest ---> 505e241c8113 Step 2 : ENV *** ---> Running in 8bd5877d7e3b ---> 18f0b2af283a Removing intermediate container 8bd5877d7e3b Step 3 : EXPOSE 8080 ---> Running in 6ec866f0d02c ---> 479b9e490fab Removing intermediate container 6ec866f0d02c Step 4 : RUN npm --version ---> Running in a00f61761e3a /bin/sh: npm: command not found error: build error: The command '/bin/sh -c npm --version' returned a non-zero code: 127 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From pkubat at redhat.com Thu Feb 22 11:29:22 2018 From: pkubat at redhat.com (Petr Kubat) Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2018 12:29:22 +0100 Subject: [scl.org] rhscl/nodejs-8-rhel7 npm: command not found In-Reply-To: <394677EBE71D7C4BBC0DD0330A98A87960D04418@wwfemr21.chres1.doleni.net> References: <394677EBE71D7C4BBC0DD0330A98A87960D04418@wwfemr21.chres1.doleni.net> Message-ID: <39df2b73-fb61-56e8-384d-3f7a853e6c65@redhat.com> Hi Adrian, the npm command is actually installed inside the image, the collection is just not enabled in your case. With `RUN bash -c "npm --version"` instead: Sending build context to Docker daemon 478.7 kB Step 1/3 : FROM registry.access.redhat.com/rhscl/nodejs-8-rhel7 Trying to pull repository registry.access.redhat.com/rhscl/nodejs-8-rhel7 ... sha256:66ae3f2d4cd53e1fa232018079afe9ccb27f451d932b3a57d158609d0ecfbaa2: Pulling from registry.access.redhat.com/rhscl/nodejs-8-rhel7 9a32f102e677: Already exists b8aa42cec17a: Already exists 84fbac7bf4f5: Pull complete e347f5c3e6de: Pull complete d7205639c454: Pull complete Digest: sha256:66ae3f2d4cd53e1fa232018079afe9ccb27f451d932b3a57d158609d0ecfbaa2 Status: Downloaded newer image for registry.access.redhat.com/rhscl/nodejs-8-rhel7:latest ?---> 505e241c8113 Step 2/3 : EXPOSE 8080 ?---> Running in 83a826e5a103 ?---> 9f3d2ed35228 Removing intermediate container 83a826e5a103 Step 3/3 : RUN bash -c "npm --version" ?---> Running in b97f25fa5fba 5.3.0 ?---> 2c1e9751d2d5 Removing intermediate container b97f25fa5fba Successfully built 2c1e9751d2d5 Hope this helps, Petr On 02/15/2018 11:32 AM, H?hn Adrian wrote: > > Hi > > I try to use your s2i image nodejs-8-rhel7 with the following > Dockerfile config on OpenShift. > > FROM registry.access.redhat.com/rhscl/nodejs-8-rhel7 > > EXPOSE 8080 > > RUN npm --version > > But when I try to build it on the Openshift platform I get the > following error: *npm: command not found* > > Can you explain me why npm cannot be found on this image and what I > have to do to make it work? I expect that npm is part of a node image, > not? > > Thanks for your support, > > Adrian > > Openshift Logfile: > > Pulling image registry.access.redhat.com/rhscl/nodejs-8-rhel7 ... > > Pulled 2/5 layers, 41% complete > > Pulled 3/5 layers, 63% complete > > Pulled 4/5 layers, 84% complete > > Pulled 5/5 layers, 100% complete > > Extracting > > Step 1 : FROM registry.access.redhat.com/rhscl/nodejs-8-rhel7 > > Trying to pull repository > registry.access.redhat.com/rhscl/nodejs-8-rhel7 ... > > sha256:66ae3f2d4cd53e1fa232018079afe9ccb27f451d932b3a57d158609d0ecfbaa2: > Pulling from registry.access.redhat.com/rhscl/nodejs-8-rhel7 > > 9a32f102e677: Already exists > > b8aa42cec17a: Already exists > > 84fbac7bf4f5: Already exists > > e347f5c3e6de: Already exists > > d7205639c454: Already exists > > Digest: > sha256:66ae3f2d4cd53e1fa232018079afe9ccb27f451d932b3a57d158609d0ecfbaa2 > > Status: Image is up to date for > registry.access.redhat.com/rhscl/nodejs-8-rhel7:latest > > ---> 505e241c8113 > > Step 2 : ENV *** > > ---> Running in 8bd5877d7e3b > > ---> 18f0b2af283a > > Removing intermediate container 8bd5877d7e3b > > Step 3 : EXPOSE 8080 > > ---> Running in 6ec866f0d02c > > ---> 479b9e490fab > > Removing intermediate container 6ec866f0d02c > > Step 4 : RUN npm --version > > ---> Running in a00f61761e3a > > /bin/sh: npm: command not found > > error: build error: The command '/bin/sh -c npm --version' returned a > non-zero code: 127 > > > > _______________________________________________ > SCLorg mailing list > SCLorg at redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/sclorg -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From josep.moscardo at embl.de Fri Feb 23 11:41:23 2018 From: josep.moscardo at embl.de (=?UTF-8?Q?Josep_Manel_Andr=c3=a9s_Moscard=c3=b3?=) Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2018 12:41:23 +0100 Subject: [scl.org] LAMP setup using SCL Message-ID: <4ec8ee55-944d-1bdf-0519-93907213d30b@embl.de> Hi, I am deploying the a LAMP server running CentOS but I need to run updated PHP and MySQL versions. Since this is my first time running SCL I thought it would be alright installing PHP from SCL, MySQL from their own official repos and apache from CentOS 7 repos. Should that work fine for a production environment? What would be the recommended setup when one of those dependencies doesn't meet the versions in the repos? My other question is, how should I install php extensions if they are not in the SCL repo? Thanks in advance. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: smime.p7s Type: application/pkcs7-signature Size: 5396 bytes Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature URL: From Fedora at FamilleCollet.com Fri Feb 23 11:49:09 2018 From: Fedora at FamilleCollet.com (Remi Collet) Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2018 12:49:09 +0100 Subject: [scl.org] LAMP setup using SCL In-Reply-To: <4ec8ee55-944d-1bdf-0519-93907213d30b@embl.de> References: <4ec8ee55-944d-1bdf-0519-93907213d30b@embl.de> Message-ID: <8dfaf10d-2fc7-6bdd-a774-bda3d335f218@FamilleCollet.com> Le 23/02/2018 ? 12:41, Josep Manel Andr?s Moscard? a ?crit?: > Hi, > I am deploying the a LAMP server running CentOS but I need to run > updated PHP and MySQL versions. > Since this is my first time running SCL I thought it would be alright > installing PHP from SCL, MySQL from their own official repos and apache > from CentOS 7 repos. I will recommend to pull everything from CentOS repository, including MySQL (5.6, 5.7) or MariaDB (10.0, 10.1 and 10.2) For PHP, you should read https://developers.redhat.com/blog/2017/10/25/php-configuration-tips/ > Should that work fine for a production environment? What would be the > recommended setup when one of those dependencies doesn't meet the > versions in the repos? > > My other question is, how should I install php extensions if they are > not in the SCL repo? Why ones ? Most commonly used are available => https://blog.remirepo.net/post/2017/02/23/Additional-PHP-packages-for-RHSCL More can probably be added there. Remi > > Thanks in advance. > > > > _______________________________________________ > SCLorg mailing list > SCLorg at redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/sclorg > From josep.moscardo at embl.de Fri Feb 23 12:33:22 2018 From: josep.moscardo at embl.de (=?UTF-8?Q?Josep_Manel_Andr=c3=a9s_Moscard=c3=b3?=) Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2018 13:33:22 +0100 Subject: [scl.org] LAMP setup using SCL In-Reply-To: <8dfaf10d-2fc7-6bdd-a774-bda3d335f218@FamilleCollet.com> References: <4ec8ee55-944d-1bdf-0519-93907213d30b@embl.de> <8dfaf10d-2fc7-6bdd-a774-bda3d335f218@FamilleCollet.com> Message-ID: Hi Remi, thanks. What do you mean pulling all packages from CentOS? CentOS base doesn't have mysql 5.7 or php 5.6. Do you mean pulling them from CentOS SCL? centos-sclo-rh/x86_64 CentOS-7 - SCLo rh enabled: Thanks. On 23/02/18 12:49, Remi Collet wrote: > Le 23/02/2018 ? 12:41, Josep Manel Andr?s Moscard? a ?crit?: >> Hi, >> I am deploying the a LAMP server running CentOS but I need to run >> updated PHP and MySQL versions. >> Since this is my first time running SCL I thought it would be alright >> installing PHP from SCL, MySQL from their own official repos and apache >> from CentOS 7 repos. > > I will recommend to pull everything from CentOS repository, > including MySQL (5.6, 5.7) or MariaDB (10.0, 10.1 and 10.2) > > For PHP, you should read > https://developers.redhat.com/blog/2017/10/25/php-configuration-tips/ > >> Should that work fine for a production environment? What would be the >> recommended setup when one of those dependencies doesn't meet the >> versions in the repos? >> >> My other question is, how should I install php extensions if they are >> not in the SCL repo? > > Why ones ? > > Most commonly used are available > => > https://blog.remirepo.net/post/2017/02/23/Additional-PHP-packages-for-RHSCL > > More can probably be added there. > > > Remi > > >> >> Thanks in advance. >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> SCLorg mailing list >> SCLorg at redhat.com >> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/sclorg >> > > _______________________________________________ > SCLorg mailing list > SCLorg at redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/sclorg > -- Josep Manel Andr?s Moscard? Systems Engineer, IT Operations EMBL Heidelberg T +49 6221 387-8394 -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: smime.p7s Type: application/pkcs7-signature Size: 5396 bytes Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature URL: From Fedora at FamilleCollet.com Fri Feb 23 12:41:47 2018 From: Fedora at FamilleCollet.com (Remi Collet) Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2018 13:41:47 +0100 Subject: [scl.org] LAMP setup using SCL In-Reply-To: References: <4ec8ee55-944d-1bdf-0519-93907213d30b@embl.de> <8dfaf10d-2fc7-6bdd-a774-bda3d335f218@FamilleCollet.com> Message-ID: <91dc3221-e85c-590f-0ade-42795eacc1ae@FamilleCollet.com> Le 23/02/2018 ? 13:33, Josep Manel Andr?s Moscard? a ?crit?: > Hi Remi, thanks. > > What do you mean pulling all packages from CentOS? CentOS base doesn't > have mysql 5.7 or php 5.6. Do you mean pulling them from CentOS SCL? Yes (which is a CentOS repository ;) From josep.moscardo at embl.de Fri Feb 23 12:48:50 2018 From: josep.moscardo at embl.de (=?UTF-8?Q?Josep_Manel_Andr=c3=a9s_Moscard=c3=b3?=) Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2018 13:48:50 +0100 Subject: [scl.org] LAMP setup using SCL In-Reply-To: <91dc3221-e85c-590f-0ade-42795eacc1ae@FamilleCollet.com> References: <4ec8ee55-944d-1bdf-0519-93907213d30b@embl.de> <8dfaf10d-2fc7-6bdd-a774-bda3d335f218@FamilleCollet.com> <91dc3221-e85c-590f-0ade-42795eacc1ae@FamilleCollet.com> Message-ID: Alright, and then, what would be the appropriate way to use MySQL client ? should I type scl enable rh-mysql57 bash every time I want to use the client or make an alias? Thanks. On 23/02/18 13:41, Remi Collet wrote: > Le 23/02/2018 ? 13:33, Josep Manel Andr?s Moscard? a ?crit?: >> Hi Remi, thanks. >> >> What do you mean pulling all packages from CentOS? CentOS base doesn't >> have mysql 5.7 or php 5.6. Do you mean pulling them from CentOS SCL? > > Yes (which is a CentOS repository ;) > > _______________________________________________ > SCLorg mailing list > SCLorg at redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/sclorg > -- Josep Manel Andr?s Moscard? Systems Engineer, IT Operations EMBL Heidelberg T +49 6221 387-8394 -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: smime.p7s Type: application/pkcs7-signature Size: 5396 bytes Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature URL: From jeff at tag1consulting.com Fri Feb 23 12:51:44 2018 From: jeff at tag1consulting.com (Jeff Sheltren) Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2018 05:51:44 -0700 Subject: [scl.org] LAMP setup using SCL In-Reply-To: <91dc3221-e85c-590f-0ade-42795eacc1ae@FamilleCollet.com> References: <4ec8ee55-944d-1bdf-0519-93907213d30b@embl.de> <8dfaf10d-2fc7-6bdd-a774-bda3d335f218@FamilleCollet.com> <91dc3221-e85c-590f-0ade-42795eacc1ae@FamilleCollet.com> Message-ID: On Fri, Feb 23, 2018 at 5:41 AM, Remi Collet wrote: > Le 23/02/2018 ? 13:33, Josep Manel Andr?s Moscard? a ?crit : > > Hi Remi, thanks. > > > > What do you mean pulling all packages from CentOS? CentOS base doesn't > > have mysql 5.7 or php 5.6. Do you mean pulling them from CentOS SCL? > > Yes (which is a CentOS repository ;) > > Not to steer you away from SCL for PHP and MySQL, but there is an alternative to doing so, which I use quite often: * PHP from IUS repos https://ius.io/ * Updated MariaDB pacakges from MariaDB repos: https://downloads.mariadb.org/mariadb/repositories/ And generally I'd expect you can use httpd 2.4 from CentOS directly. Beware that security support for PHP 5.6 ends upstream at the end of this year, so if at all possible, I'd recommend running PHP 7.x; you'll also get a huge performance boost from doing so, and depending on the application you're running, code changes should be minimal. See https://secure.php.net/supported-versions.php for more info on PHP supported releases. -Jeff -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From Fedora at FamilleCollet.com Fri Feb 23 13:38:38 2018 From: Fedora at FamilleCollet.com (Remi Collet) Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2018 14:38:38 +0100 Subject: [scl.org] New sclo-php##-phpiredis 1.0.0 packages available for testing Message-ID: <93fdf3a6-2d46-e7da-850d-a4fd38c8949f@FamilleCollet.com> New packages available in centos-sclo-sclo-testing Phpiredis is an extension for PHP 5.x and 7.x based on hiredis that provides a simple and efficient client for Redis and a fast incremental parser / serializer for the RESP protocol. For rh-php56 * sclo-php56-php-phpiredis-1.0.0-1 For rh-php70 * sclo-php70-php-phpiredis-1.0.0-1 For rh-php71 * sclo-php71-php-phpiredis-1.0.0-1 This extension is also an accelerator used by the Predis pure-PHP library (https://packagist.org/packages/predis/predis) Sometime ago I wrote a blog entry about Redis access from PHP: https://blog.remirepo.net/post/2016/11/13/Redis-from-PHP Feedback welcome. Remi. P.S. https://wiki.centos.org/SpecialInterestGroup/SCLo From josep.moscardo at embl.de Fri Feb 23 13:49:26 2018 From: josep.moscardo at embl.de (=?UTF-8?Q?Josep_Manel_Andr=c3=a9s_Moscard=c3=b3?=) Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2018 14:49:26 +0100 Subject: [scl.org] LAMP setup using SCL In-Reply-To: References: <4ec8ee55-944d-1bdf-0519-93907213d30b@embl.de> <8dfaf10d-2fc7-6bdd-a774-bda3d335f218@FamilleCollet.com> <91dc3221-e85c-590f-0ade-42795eacc1ae@FamilleCollet.com> Message-ID: <9995ffd0-cd14-550c-eaf4-4212f1f32538@embl.de> Hi, Thanks, I will think about it. The thing is that I have to install all of those dependencies and I don't want to end up having a very complex to maintain system. mbstring mcrypt gd with Freetype support curl mysql MySQLi (required for PHP 5.5) MySQLnd (required for PHP 5.5 and above) pdo pdo_mysql simplexml filter json imap sockets xml dom The software we need to get there is not maintained by us, so we'll have to stick to the versions they support. But I will try to push them to update to PHP 7, thanks. On 23/02/18 13:51, Jeff Sheltren wrote: > On Fri, Feb 23, 2018 at 5:41 AM, Remi Collet > wrote: > > Le 23/02/2018 ? 13:33, Josep Manel Andr?s Moscard? a ?crit?: > > Hi Remi, thanks. > > > > What do you mean pulling all packages from CentOS? CentOS base doesn't > > have mysql 5.7 or php 5.6. Do you mean pulling them from CentOS SCL? > > Yes (which is a CentOS repository ;) > > > Not to steer you away from SCL for PHP and MySQL, but there is an > alternative to doing so, which I use quite often: > > * PHP from IUS repos https://ius.io/ > * Updated MariaDB pacakges from MariaDB repos: > https://downloads.mariadb.org/mariadb/repositories/ > > And generally I'd expect you can use httpd 2.4 from CentOS directly. > > Beware that security support for PHP 5.6 ends upstream at the end of > this year, so if at all possible, I'd recommend running PHP 7.x; you'll > also get a huge performance boost from doing so, and depending on the > application you're running, code changes should be minimal. See > https://secure.php.net/supported-versions.php for more info on PHP > supported releases. > > -Jeff > > > > _______________________________________________ > SCLorg mailing list > SCLorg at redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/sclorg > -- Josep Manel Andr?s Moscard? Systems Engineer, IT Operations EMBL Heidelberg T +49 6221 387-8394 -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: smime.p7s Type: application/pkcs7-signature Size: 5396 bytes Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature URL: From Fedora at FamilleCollet.com Fri Feb 23 13:53:52 2018 From: Fedora at FamilleCollet.com (Remi Collet) Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2018 14:53:52 +0100 Subject: [scl.org] LAMP setup using SCL In-Reply-To: <9995ffd0-cd14-550c-eaf4-4212f1f32538@embl.de> References: <4ec8ee55-944d-1bdf-0519-93907213d30b@embl.de> <8dfaf10d-2fc7-6bdd-a774-bda3d335f218@FamilleCollet.com> <91dc3221-e85c-590f-0ade-42795eacc1ae@FamilleCollet.com> <9995ffd0-cd14-550c-eaf4-4212f1f32538@embl.de> Message-ID: <51ec995e-6c27-1261-2c1c-12490e518a52@FamilleCollet.com> Le 23/02/2018 ? 14:49, Josep Manel Andr?s Moscard? a ?crit?: > The thing is that I have to install all of those dependencies and I > don't want to end up having a very complex to maintain system. > > > ??? mbstring > ??? mcrypt > ??? gd with Freetype support > ??? curl > ??? mysql > ??? MySQLi (required for PHP 5.5) > ??? MySQLnd (required for PHP 5.5 and above) > ??? pdo > ??? pdo_mysql > ??? simplexml > ??? filter > ??? json > ??? imap > ??? sockets > ??? xml > ??? dom Nothing special, everything is available. About mcrypt, definitively a bad idea, please read https://blog.remirepo.net/post/2015/07/07/About-libmcrypt-and-php-mcrypt BTW, available in centos-sclo-sclo repostiory (not in centos-sclo-rh) Remi