From jstanek at redhat.com Thu Jan 2 10:55:12 2020 From: jstanek at redhat.com (=?UTF-8?Q?Jan_Stan=c4=9bk?=) Date: Thu, 2 Jan 2020 11:55:12 +0100 Subject: [scl.org] Migration of the production environment of softwarecollections.org Message-ID: <4bdd706e-f75a-0d18-ef6e-e91cea419487@redhat.com> Hi everyone, after a long preparation, I'm pleased to announce that the softwarecollections.org website will be migrated to an OpenShift platform. The migration is scheduled on 2019-01-09 around 13:00 CET. Estimated downtime (for DB migration, certificate deployment, etc.) is 1 hour, but can be longer (several hours) if unforeseen complications arise. Please be patient. Thanks for understanding and wish me luck :) Happy new year! -- Jan Stan?k Associate Software Engineer Red Hat EMEA jstanek at redhat.com IM: jstanek From jmercier at cng.fr Thu Jan 2 14:31:02 2020 From: jmercier at cng.fr (Jonathan MERCIER) Date: Thu, 2 Jan 2020 15:31:02 +0100 Subject: [scl.org] how to configure mock for SCL ? Message-ID: <1133cca9-8b52-38e8-2f7e-160b46d52402@cng.fr> Dear, I try to use mock wiyth SCL but I have some complication: I have: 1/ a source rpm file from rpmbuild -bs ... 2/ a mock config file $ cat fedora-30-scl-x86_64.cfg include('/etc/mock/templates/fedora-30.tpl') config_opts['chroot_setup_cmd'] = 'install @buildsys-build scl-utils-build scl-utils' config_opts['target_arch'] = 'x86_64' config_opts['legal_host_arches'] = ('x86_64',) config_opts['root'] = 'fedora-30-scl-x86_64' --------------------------------------------------------------- 3/ add current user to mock group and check it with th id command 4/ init the mock environnment $ sudo mock -r fedora-30-scl-x86_64.cfg --init --------------------------------------------------------------- 5/ rebuild $ sudo mock -r fedora-scl-30-x86_64.cfg --define "scl jonathan-llvm-ldc900"? --rebuild SRPMS/jonathan-llvm-ldc900-llvm-ldc-9.0.0-1.fc30.src.rpm $ cat /var/lib/mock/fedora-30-scl-x86_64/result/build.log follow the link to see its content ----> https://paste.centos.org/view/dda8bba1 --------------------------------------------------------------- And that fail at this step! The buildscript from the spec file is launched and fail as cmake do not found the source. from the log I see the build directory it is: /builddir/build/BUILD/ but this directory do not exists. So how to configure mock to create the expected buildir to be used for SCLs ? thanks Have a nice day -- Jonathan MERCIER Researcher computational biology PhD, Jonathan MERCIER Centre National de Recherche en G?nomique Humaine (CNRGH) Bioinformatics (LBI) 2, rue Gaston Cr?mieux 91057 Evry Cedex Tel :(33) 1 60 87 83 44 Email :jonathan.mercier at cnrgh.fr -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: opbnhadmohkhgdnh. Type: image/jpg Size: 5638 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: blbdbihgkageipmb. Type: image/jpg Size: 17553 bytes Desc: not available URL: From jmercier at cng.fr Thu Jan 2 14:57:50 2020 From: jmercier at cng.fr (Jonathan MERCIER) Date: Thu, 2 Jan 2020 15:57:50 +0100 Subject: [scl.org] how to configure mock for SCL ? In-Reply-To: <1133cca9-8b52-38e8-2f7e-160b46d52402@cng.fr> References: <1133cca9-8b52-38e8-2f7e-160b46d52402@cng.fr> Message-ID: <15fee30c-4dd1-db19-b7a7-6231b1969812@cng.fr> Ok so I finally get he understanding when it is wrote /bildir it refer to the chroot path wichi is /var/lib/mock/fedora-30-scl-x86_64/root So now I have to found why the %prep exit with sucess without to unpack the source using mock while that works with rpmbuild directly Le 02/01/2020 ? 15:31, Jonathan MERCIER a ?crit?: > > Dear, > > I try to use mock wiyth SCL but I have some complication: > > I have: > > 1/ a source rpm file from rpmbuild -bs ... > > 2/ a mock config file > > $ cat fedora-30-scl-x86_64.cfg > include('/etc/mock/templates/fedora-30.tpl') > config_opts['chroot_setup_cmd'] = 'install @buildsys-build > scl-utils-build scl-utils' > config_opts['target_arch'] = 'x86_64' > config_opts['legal_host_arches'] = ('x86_64',) > config_opts['root'] = 'fedora-30-scl-x86_64' > > --------------------------------------------------------------- > > 3/ add current user to mock group and check it with th id command > > 4/ init the mock environnment > > $ sudo mock -r fedora-30-scl-x86_64.cfg --init > > --------------------------------------------------------------- > > 5/ rebuild > > $ sudo mock -r fedora-scl-30-x86_64.cfg --define "scl > jonathan-llvm-ldc900"? --rebuild > SRPMS/jonathan-llvm-ldc900-llvm-ldc-9.0.0-1.fc30.src.rpm > > $ cat /var/lib/mock/fedora-30-scl-x86_64/result/build.log > > follow the link to see its content ----> > https://paste.centos.org/view/dda8bba1 > > --------------------------------------------------------------- > > And that fail at this step! > > The buildscript from the spec file is launched and fail as cmake do > not found the source. > > from the log I see the build directory it is: /builddir/build/BUILD/ > > but this directory do not exists. > > So how to configure mock to create the expected buildir to be used for > SCLs ? > > > thanks > > > Have a nice day > > -- > > Jonathan MERCIER > > Researcher computational biology > > PhD, Jonathan MERCIER > > Centre National de Recherche en G?nomique Humaine (CNRGH) > > Bioinformatics (LBI) > > 2, rue Gaston Cr?mieux > > 91057 Evry Cedex > > Tel :(33) 1 60 87 83 44 > > Email :jonathan.mercier at cnrgh.fr > > > _______________________________________________ > SCLorg mailing list > SCLorg at redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/sclorg -- Jonathan MERCIER Researcher computational biology PhD, Jonathan MERCIER Centre National de Recherche en G?nomique Humaine (CNRGH) Bioinformatics (LBI) 2, rue Gaston Cr?mieux 91057 Evry Cedex Tel :(33) 1 60 87 83 44 Email :jonathan.mercier at cnrgh.fr -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: opbnhadmohkhgdnh. Type: image/png Size: 5638 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: blbdbihgkageipmb. Type: image/png Size: 17553 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: jcelijhjhckdaoan. Type: image/jpg Size: 5638 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: jhfmgikfeeajbhel. Type: image/jpg Size: 17553 bytes Desc: not available URL: From hhorak at redhat.com Fri Jan 3 12:35:43 2020 From: hhorak at redhat.com (Honza Horak) Date: Fri, 3 Jan 2020 13:35:43 +0100 Subject: [scl.org] how to configure mock for SCL ? In-Reply-To: <1133cca9-8b52-38e8-2f7e-160b46d52402@cng.fr> References: <1133cca9-8b52-38e8-2f7e-160b46d52402@cng.fr> Message-ID: <870e8d4b-f37d-74cd-8a1f-92dcbef0d3c2@redhat.com> Hi Jonathan, it would help if you could explain your goal. Are you trying to build a new collection? Or extending the llvm-toolset somehow? From the first sight, it looks like there needs to be something changed in the spec file of your jonathan-llvm-ldc900-llvm-ldc SRPM package, but hard to tell without seeing it. Is the source available somewhere? The packaging guidelines are available at https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-us/red_hat_software_collections/3/html/packaging_guide/index, just in case you might have missed that. Honza On 1/2/20 3:31 PM, Jonathan MERCIER wrote: > Dear, > > I try to use mock wiyth SCL but I have some complication: > > I have: > > 1/ a source rpm file from rpmbuild -bs ... > > 2/ a mock config file > > $ cat fedora-30-scl-x86_64.cfg > include('/etc/mock/templates/fedora-30.tpl') > config_opts['chroot_setup_cmd'] = 'install @buildsys-build > scl-utils-build scl-utils' > config_opts['target_arch'] = 'x86_64' > config_opts['legal_host_arches'] = ('x86_64',) > config_opts['root'] = 'fedora-30-scl-x86_64' > > --------------------------------------------------------------- > > 3/ add current user to mock group and check it with th id command > > 4/ init the mock environnment > > $ sudo mock -r fedora-30-scl-x86_64.cfg --init > > --------------------------------------------------------------- > > 5/ rebuild > > $ sudo mock -r fedora-scl-30-x86_64.cfg --define "scl > jonathan-llvm-ldc900"? --rebuild > SRPMS/jonathan-llvm-ldc900-llvm-ldc-9.0.0-1.fc30.src.rpm > > $ cat /var/lib/mock/fedora-30-scl-x86_64/result/build.log > > follow the link to see its content ----> > https://paste.centos.org/view/dda8bba1 > > --------------------------------------------------------------- > > And that fail at this step! > > The buildscript from the spec file is launched and fail as cmake do not > found the source. > > from the log I see the build directory it is: /builddir/build/BUILD/ > > but this directory do not exists. > > So how to configure mock to create the expected buildir to be used for > SCLs ? > > > thanks > > > Have a nice day > > -- > > Jonathan MERCIER > > Researcher computational biology > > PhD, Jonathan MERCIER > > Centre National de Recherche en G?nomique Humaine (CNRGH) > > Bioinformatics (LBI) > > 2, rue Gaston Cr?mieux > > 91057 Evry Cedex > > Tel :(33) 1 60 87 83 44 > > Email :jonathan.mercier at cnrgh.fr > > > _______________________________________________ > SCLorg mailing list > SCLorg at redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/sclorg > From jmercier at cng.fr Tue Jan 7 12:22:14 2020 From: jmercier at cng.fr (Jonathan MERCIER) Date: Tue, 7 Jan 2020 13:22:14 +0100 Subject: [scl.org] Is it allowed to have one metapackage with multiple rpm Message-ID: <79c68592-d506-9f0c-3754-0ae1674e8335@cng.fr> Dear, I would like to know if I can do one metapackage with multiple rpm? The goal it is to load a full environment for D development like: |scl enable dlang-2.088.1| which will load various rpm (compiler and D librairies) Thanks for your insight -- Jonathan MERCIER Researcher computational biology PhD, Jonathan MERCIER Centre National de Recherche en G?nomique Humaine (CNRGH) Bioinformatics (LBI) 2, rue Gaston Cr?mieux 91057 Evry Cedex Tel :(33) 1 60 87 83 44 Email :jonathan.mercier at cnrgh.fr -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: kfgneacfinmlagbh. Type: image/jpg Size: 5638 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: jgmdkpbnnfcbaeei. Type: image/jpg Size: 17553 bytes Desc: not available URL: From racooper at tamu.edu Wed Jan 8 04:06:20 2020 From: racooper at tamu.edu (Robert Cooper) Date: Wed, 8 Jan 2020 04:06:20 +0000 Subject: [scl.org] Issue with EL7 package in EL6 SCLO PHP repository In-Reply-To: References: <2b13792cfa7d48a687e6a694d8fe8043@tamu.edu>, Message-ID: <133fc315aae84ee4a7b4565424e509cc@tamu.edu> I'm *still* having an issue with the incorrect package in the el6 repo. It's breaking updates without taking extraordinary measures to work around. The el7 package is overriding the el6 package of the same version and revision (2.5.0-1). RobertC ________________________________ From: sclorg-bounces at redhat.com on behalf of Remi Collet Sent: Wednesday, December 4, 2019 00:54 To: sclorg at redhat.com Subject: Re: [scl.org] Issue with EL7 package in EL6 SCLO PHP repository Le 04/12/2019 ? 07:01, Robert Cooper a ?crit : > While updating a CentOS 6 server, I found that the package sclo-php70-php-pecl-solr2-2.4.0-1.el6.x86_64.rpm is being superseded by sclo-php70-php-pecl-solr2-2.5.0-1.el7.x86_64.rpm, an el7 package. It took me a bit to realize that was the cause of the dependency errors that yum upgrade was throwing. Indeed the packages were badly tagged. Sorry for this. I just fix the tag, so the proper package should appears soon (don't know if the bad can be removed) Please notice that according to RHSCL life cycle https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__access.redhat.com_support_policy_updates_rhscl_&d=DwIGaQ&c=u6LDEWzohnDQ01ySGnxMzg&r=KswHmwGrFBtF2yzsY5A-WuCtAD1fks9r8s2Y1Zl2E2U&m=E_l-c3xN3TStQKDd5xirktmZKESL8-5zDOjiBHea7lI&s=1FiTlPqp8Pd1xT24ehQ_LLBGPuZQiP2v6MkNHhuceRc&e= the rh-php70 collection have reached its EOL and will not received any update. Only rh-php72 (and soon rh-php73) are supported and only on CentOS 7 Remi > > > I see both packages on https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__mirror.centos.org_centos_6_sclo_x86-5F64_sclo_sclo-2Dphp70_&d=DwIGaQ&c=u6LDEWzohnDQ01ySGnxMzg&r=KswHmwGrFBtF2yzsY5A-WuCtAD1fks9r8s2Y1Zl2E2U&m=E_l-c3xN3TStQKDd5xirktmZKESL8-5zDOjiBHea7lI&s=CPCQ0JYPztBwNVv8VJI9-CtDhzibOQxQQujm93_7cjQ&e= . It also appears that the 2.5-1 el6 package version is still in sclo testing, if that helps any. > > > Thanks, > > RobertC > > > -- > Robert A. Cooper > Lead Infrastructure Systems Engineer > Red Hat Certified Engineer > CompTIA A+, Network+ Certified > Division of Information Technology | Texas A&M University > racooper at tamu.edu > Mail Stop 1368 | College Station, TX 77843-1368 > Tel. 979-862-1262 > IT.tamu.edu > > > _______________________________________________ > SCLorg mailing list > SCLorg at redhat.com > https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.redhat.com_mailman_listinfo_sclorg&d=DwIGaQ&c=u6LDEWzohnDQ01ySGnxMzg&r=KswHmwGrFBtF2yzsY5A-WuCtAD1fks9r8s2Y1Zl2E2U&m=E_l-c3xN3TStQKDd5xirktmZKESL8-5zDOjiBHea7lI&s=Q2HAfpc6bkBvw6rrN7oWcAl6wGEwypnMti-92ExRwhM&e= > _______________________________________________ SCLorg mailing list SCLorg at redhat.com https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.redhat.com_mailman_listinfo_sclorg&d=DwIGaQ&c=u6LDEWzohnDQ01ySGnxMzg&r=KswHmwGrFBtF2yzsY5A-WuCtAD1fks9r8s2Y1Zl2E2U&m=E_l-c3xN3TStQKDd5xirktmZKESL8-5zDOjiBHea7lI&s=Q2HAfpc6bkBvw6rrN7oWcAl6wGEwypnMti-92ExRwhM&e= -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From jstanek at redhat.com Thu Jan 9 14:21:49 2020 From: jstanek at redhat.com (=?UTF-8?Q?Jan_Stan=c4=9bk?=) Date: Thu, 9 Jan 2020 15:21:49 +0100 Subject: [scl.org] Migration of the production environment of softwarecollections.org In-Reply-To: <4bdd706e-f75a-0d18-ef6e-e91cea419487@redhat.com> References: <4bdd706e-f75a-0d18-ef6e-e91cea419487@redhat.com> Message-ID: <5dc77cfe-a91f-950f-4662-93bbaaa834c2@redhat.com> Hello everyone, unfortunately, the migration attempt was unsuccessful, due to problems discovered in OpenShift routing configuration and TLS certificate handling. While I investigate the proper solutions to these problems, the original deployment will be used. Sorry for any inconvenience you might have experienced today. Best regards, -- Jan Stan?k Associate Software Engineer Red Hat EMEA jstanek at redhat.com IM: jstanek