From adam.stokes at canonical.com Mon Aug 13 03:52:02 2012 From: adam.stokes at canonical.com (Adam Stokes) Date: Sun, 12 Aug 2012 23:52:02 -0400 Subject: [sos-devel] pull requests sitting in queue Message-ID: <502879E2.4090102@canonical.com> Hi, Just a friendly update to let those involved with managing the github repo that there are several pull requests waiting for ack/nack and merge into upstream. Thanks! Adam From bmr at redhat.com Mon Aug 13 18:06:30 2012 From: bmr at redhat.com (Bryn M. Reeves) Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2012 19:06:30 +0100 Subject: [sos-devel] pull requests sitting in queue In-Reply-To: <502879E2.4090102@canonical.com> References: <502879E2.4090102@canonical.com> Message-ID: <50294226.30209@redhat.com> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 08/13/2012 04:52 AM, Adam Stokes wrote: > Just a friendly update to let those involved with managing the > github repo that there are several pull requests waiting for > ack/nack and merge into upstream. Hey Stokes, Was there any request you wanted to get resolved asap? I'm working on sos upstream as well as the RHEL packaging now so I will try to get these processed this week (I noticed we have some goofy commits way back on the RHEL6 branch so I may re-write that history again - it's supposed to be there to track the RPM package changes). Regards, Bryn. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAlApQiYACgkQ6YSQoMYUY94x6wCePeJSgPfLCYA2gZEUywMyaUPN p84AnAum1OJ2hc9V5NlZwtw5gzQ3+AED =7Xjq -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From adam.stokes at canonical.com Mon Aug 13 21:03:59 2012 From: adam.stokes at canonical.com (Adam Stokes) Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2012 17:03:59 -0400 Subject: [sos-devel] pull requests sitting in queue In-Reply-To: <50294226.30209@redhat.com> References: <502879E2.4090102@canonical.com> <50294226.30209@redhat.com> Message-ID: <50296BBF.7020908@canonical.com> On 08/13/2012 02:06 PM, Bryn M. Reeves wrote: > On 08/13/2012 04:52 AM, Adam Stokes wrote: > > Just a friendly update to let those involved with managing the > > github repo that there are several pull requests waiting for > > ack/nack and merge into upstream. > > Hey Stokes, > > Was there any request you wanted to get resolved asap? > > I'm working on sos upstream as well as the RHEL packaging now so I > will try to get these processed this week (I noticed we have some > goofy commits way back on the RHEL6 branch so I may re-write that > history again - it's supposed to be there to track the RPM package > changes). > > Regards, > Bryn. > Hey Bryn, It looks like Jesse got that latest pull request from Justin @ Rackspace merge upstream. That was the big one since he's done a lot of work with openstack and the fact that Rackspace recognizes sosreport as viable analysis tool is a huge step for the project. Thanks for the quick turnaround on this :D Adam From kroberts at redhat.com Mon Aug 27 14:32:08 2012 From: kroberts at redhat.com (Keith Robertson) Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2012 10:32:08 -0400 Subject: [sos-devel] PostgresSQL SoS plug-in Message-ID: <503B84E8.8080104@redhat.com> Bryn, I pushed the PostgresSQL SoS plug-in to the private-kroberts-BZ852049 branch. Also, I bumped the version to 31 from 30 (which is the same as the previous patch). I didn't want to stack the patches. In any case, you can mod the version as necessary. Features: - Local and remote PG DB dumping (this is optional as it requires auth). - Scooping of logs and conf files (default behavior) Cheers, Keith -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: sos-bz852049-psql.patch Type: text/x-patch Size: 4314 bytes Desc: not available URL: From adam.stokes at canonical.com Mon Aug 27 17:10:04 2012 From: adam.stokes at canonical.com (Adam Stokes) Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2012 13:10:04 -0400 Subject: [sos-devel] PostgresSQL SoS plug-in In-Reply-To: <503B84E8.8080104@redhat.com> References: <503B84E8.8080104@redhat.com> Message-ID: <503BA9EC.5010205@canonical.com> On 08/27/2012 10:32 AM, Keith Robertson wrote: > Bryn, > > I pushed the PostgresSQL SoS plug-in to the private-kroberts-BZ852049 > branch. Also, I bumped the version to 31 from 30 (which is the same > as the previous patch). I didn't want to stack the patches. In any > case, you can mod the version as necessary. > > Features: > - Local and remote PG DB dumping (this is optional as it requires auth). > - Scooping of logs and conf files (default behavior) > > Cheers, > Keith > > > _______________________________________________ > Sos-devel mailing list > Sos-devel at redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/sos-devel Instead of removing the temp dir should we just leave it for cron to clean up at a later date? I've never liked the idea of doing anything that revolved around removing/renaming files Thanks Adam From bmr at redhat.com Tue Aug 28 09:24:12 2012 From: bmr at redhat.com (Bryn M. Reeves) Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2012 10:24:12 +0100 Subject: [sos-devel] PostgresSQL SoS plug-in In-Reply-To: <503BA9EC.5010205@canonical.com> References: <503B84E8.8080104@redhat.com> <503BA9EC.5010205@canonical.com> Message-ID: <503C8E3C.2090308@redhat.com> On 08/27/2012 06:10 PM, Adam Stokes wrote: > Instead of removing the temp dir should we just leave it for cron to > clean up at a later date? I've never liked the idea of doing anything > that revolved around removing/renaming files Generally I think we should be able to clean up after ourselves (there are established practices for ensuring that's possible). This is e.g. one reason that I don't like the behaviour of some of the new daemons we need to support - glusterd for e.g. accepts a USR1 signal to trigger it to dump files with hard-to-predict names into /tmp. Bryn.