[Spacewalk-list] CentOS 5.2 - a warning

[Ralph Angenendt]

John Hodrien wrote:
>> So, folks, be warned.... This is *not* a Spacewalk problem - I suppose I
>> should tell the CentOS folks, but since I know there are a number of other
>> folks working with CentOS here, thought I'd mention it.
>
> Only report it if you're really really really sure you're not wasting their
> time.  I just don't see anything to backup your claims of doom.  5.2 repos
> look a whole lot like 5.3 repos, and look perfectly fine to me.

Multiarch sucks (sometimes), but there really isn't anything wrong with
our repositories regarding i686 packages (and there is no i686 kernel in
the 5.2/5.3 repositories). Luckily the original poster didn't look for
i386 packages <vbeg>.

Not a bug in CentOS. Really. Red Hat should have the same packages in
the x86_64 tree.

Ralph
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/spacewalk-list/attachments/20090422/ad3de1fa/attachment.sig>