[Spacewalk-list] Why I want to give up on spacewalk

[Gurjeet Singh]

On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 4:07 AM, <m.roth2006 at rcn.com> wrote:

> Folks,
>
> >Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 22:28:04 +0000 (GMT)
> >From: John Hodrien <J.H.Hodrien at leeds.ac.uk>
> >Subject: RE: [Spacewalk-list] Why I want to give up on spacewalk
> >To: "'spacewalk-list at redhat.com'" <spacewalk-list at redhat.com>
> >
> >On Thu, 5 Feb 2009, Coe, Colin C. (Unix Engineer) wrote:
> >
> >> I would have said 2GB RAM minimum.
> >
> >And I'm looking forward to moving onto a box with more.  A 0.3 install
> with 4G
> >has been acting a /lot/ happier than a 0.4 install on 2G.
>
> The .1 version in test is happy, apparently, with 1G. However, when I ran
> top, and watched the memory as I just tried to hit the manage button, and it
> didn't max out. I'm afraid there's something deeper missing here.
>

I think so too...

I have a Spacewalk instance running just fine on 512 MB RAM on CentOS. I
haven't registered any clients yet, but I don't think that matters much.

Best regards,
-- 
gurjeet[.singh]@EnterpriseDB.com
EnterpriseDB      http://www.enterprisedb.com

singh.gurjeet@{ gmail | hotmail | indiatimes | yahoo }.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/spacewalk-list/attachments/20090205/39783ac2/attachment.htm>