[Spacewalk-list] Mr. 500 here... more info

[Máirí­n Duffy]

m.roth2006 at rcn.com wrote:
> Mairin,
> 
>> Date: Thu, 05 Feb 2009 17:00:47 -0500 From: Máirín Duffy
>> <duffy at redhat.com> m.roth2006 at rcn.com wrote:
>>>> What is in this template? That seems like a good place to
>>>> investigate. If it's not CentOSSS @Base, then the problem may
>>>> lie in diff between the template you're using and @Base.
>>> Not sure - but again, let me note that I believe it's *exactly*
>>> the same that's running on the test system, that spacewalk .1 is
>>> running happily in.
>>> 
>> You "believe" but do you "know" ? :)
> 
> Ya got me! <falls to floor> Test (spacewalk .1): uname -a Linux
> chi-test-spacewalk 2.6.18-92.1.6.el5 #1 SMP Wed Jun 25 13:49:24 EDT
> 2008 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux Prod (the new one): uname -a Linux
> corp-spwk-chi-02.trustwave.com 2.6.18-92.1.13.el5 #1 SMP Wed Sep 24
> 19:33:52 EDT 2008 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux
> 
> However, lsb_release -a tells me that they're the same. So, looks
> like minor upgrades. But if I have to assume that spacewalk is that
> fragile, or that a major change that breaks thing that are built for
> that o/s, *and* if the rpm requirements will only allow it if it
> matches, that there are some hidden things, I'm in deep do-do. I'm
> not really up to debugging the full o/s....

can you do rpm -qa on each and diff it?

~m