[Spacewalk-list] i386 vs. x86_64

[Kennedy, Ryan]

I set up my channels to all use x86_64 and I have a system or two I kickstarted using those channels.  Initially it showed about 15 packages that needed updated and all of them were x86_64, but just the other day (seemingly out of the blue) that number more than doubled and now I am seeing both i386 and x86_64 versions listed as needing to be updated on the client.  I can see that my local satellite repo on my spacewalk server has both i386 and x86_64 versions of the packages in question which seems a bit odd considering my channels/repos are all set to x86_64 for architecture.  Can anyone set me straight on this?  It is puzzling to me why it would only show x86_64 packages in the updates for several weeks and then all of a sudden show i386 version of the same packages as well.

--Ryan

DISCLAIMER:
Information contained in this message may be privileged and confidential. 
If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, be notified 
that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is 
strictly prohibited. If this communication is received in error, please 
notify the sender immediately by replying to the message and deleting 
from your computer. Thank you