[Spacewalk-list] Can't register a client with spacewalk 1.0

Jan Pazdziora jpazdziora at redhat.com
Wed May 5 11:29:34 UTC 2010


On Wed, May 05, 2010 at 12:38:12PM +0200, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> >
> >I did that change after talking to Mirek who (IIRC) did the bump to 2
> >and change of the parameters type from list to hash as part of the
> >"rpm installation date" feature. We primarily did that for Fedoras,
> >but the worst thing which should have happened is that the
> >installation dates would not show up on the server.
> 
> Nope. Based on that capability is sent either list or dictionary. So
> worst thing which can happend is blow up of traceback due
> incompatible data structure, which is afaik happening right now.

Alright. Why doesn't Spacewalk 1.0 handle the list?

-- 
Jan Pazdziora
Principal Software Engineer, Satellite Engineering, Red Hat




More information about the Spacewalk-list mailing list