[Spacewalk-list] Architecture question

Pierre Casenove pcasenove at gmail.com
Tue Aug 9 15:46:01 UTC 2011


Hello,
Thanks you for your answer. I think I will set up something like you have
done for centos.

Pierre


2011/8/9 John Hodrien <J.H.Hodrien at leeds.ac.uk>

> On Mon, 8 Aug 2011, Martin Eggen wrote:
>
>  Hi,
>>
>> the Updates channel receive all updates packages. I used this layout
>> mostly
>> because it was suggested for the CentOS channels, and it also matches my
>> yum
>> repositories as created by mrepo. For some systems I want to be able to
>> subscribe them just to a specific Base channel (RHEL 5.x) and then adding
>> updates later as needed.
>>
>> I created one main configuration channel pr. OS (we have both RHEL and
>> Solaris systems), and then some role/application specific channels. Make
>> sure to rank the more specific configuration channels higher than the
>> general channel (so any common configuration files will read the more
>> specific version).
>>
>
> I could never quite decide the right/best way to lay out the channels.
>
> This time I've gone with:
>
> CentOS 6 (contains no packages)
>  ------CentOS 6.0
>  ------CentOS 6.0 updates
>  ------CentOS 6.0 approved updates
>  ------CentOS 6 internal packages
>
> Then when 6.1 comes out, I can add a 6.1 child channel, test a new
> kickstart
> against it (without disturbing the existing 6.0 kickstart).  I can test
> updates to 6.1 without disturbing the existing 6.0 machines.  Moving from
> 6.0
> to 6.1 doesn't affect the base channel subscription.  6.0 updates would be
> a
> regularly repo-synced version of 6.0 updates, and 6.0 approved updates
> would
> contain a subset of the updates channel.
>
> jh
>
>
> ______________________________**_________________
> Spacewalk-list mailing list
> Spacewalk-list at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/**mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-**list<https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-list>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/spacewalk-list/attachments/20110809/5f5da6a9/attachment.htm>


More information about the Spacewalk-list mailing list