[Spacewalk-list] spacewalk-proxy and osad

Wojtak, Greg GregWojtak at quickenloans.com
Fri Jun 24 12:43:13 UTC 2011



On 2011-06-24 3:38 AM, "Tom Brown" <tom at ng23.net> wrote:

>
>
>On 24 Jun 2011, at 08:28, "Florian CROUZAT" <gentoo at floriancrouzat.net>
>wrote:
>
>>> I don't have the original e-mail thread, but I was wondering if anybody
>>> ever figured out or got a lead on the issue with clients communicating
>>> with spacewalk proxy not having their osad status updating properly and
>>> don't appear to communicate with spacewalk at all.  My set up is
>>> 
>>> Spacewalk server:
>>> Server: CentOS 5.6
>>> Spacewalk: 1.4
>>> 
>>> Spacewalk Proxy:
>>> Server: CentOS 5.6
>>> Spacewalk Proxy installed from 1.2 repo.  I've updated the repo rpm's
>>> and updated.
>>> 
>>> Did anyone get this solved, or have any ideas on things to check?
>> 
>> 
>> Here is the original thread:
>> https://www.redhat.com/archives/spacewalk-list/2011-June/msg00026.html
>> As far as I'm concerned I still haven't solved this issue and haven't
>>any
>> new clues to investigate.
>> My configuration is exactly the same as yours (5.6/1.4)
>> 
>> Florian.
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Spacewalk-list mailing list
>> Spacewalk-list at redhat.com
>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-list
>
>I have never seen or got osad working through a proxy
>
>_______________________________________________
>Spacewalk-list mailing list
>Spacewalk-list at redhat.com
>https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-list

One other thing I'm unsure of in this set up - it sounds like 80, 443, and
5269 are the only ports that need to be opened up going from the proxy to
the spacewalk server.  It seems like 5222 needs to be opened as well
since, unless I totally have something configured wrong, the proxy server
is also a spacewalk client.  Should that not be the case?  





More information about the Spacewalk-list mailing list