[Spacewalk-list] Modification of spacewalk-service script

[Pierre Casenove]

Hello,
Are you interested in adding the option to control the database in the
configuration file and that I propose a patch or not?

Thanks,

Pierre

2011/11/3 Pierre Casenove <pcasenove at gmail.com>

> Hey,
> It's just my point of view, but spacewalk is kind of ressource consuming
> on a server and in my point of view, it should be alone. But I understand
> some people does put other DB on the same server than spacewalk.
> Reading at the discussion, I think that the admin should be able to tell
> if the DB should be controlled or not by the script in /etc/rhn/rhn.conf. I
> don't think that this idea has been implemented.
>
> OK for oracle control.
>
> Anyway, I'll try to find how to get rid of the osa-dispatcher log message.
>
> Pierre
>
>
>
> 2011/11/3 Jan Pazdziora <jpazdziora at redhat.com>
>
>> On Thu, Nov 03, 2011 at 10:55:44AM +0100, Pierre Casenove wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> > I understand (although I don't share the conclusion: if postgresql is
>> > running locally, only spacewalk database should exist).
>>
>> Why exactly?
>>
>> > In that case, why leaving the test if /etc/init.d/oracle is executable
>> in
>> > the script and the DB_SERVICE variable?
>>
>> That is Satellite embedded database thing. Note that the typical
>> Oracle XE installation uses the oracle-xe service name.
>>
>> --
>> Jan Pazdziora
>> Principal Software Engineer, Satellite Engineering, Red Hat
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Spacewalk-list mailing list
>> Spacewalk-list at redhat.com
>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-list
>>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/spacewalk-list/attachments/20111108/63a2e87a/attachment.htm>