[Spacewalk-list] Activation key and "Spacewalk Default"
Musayev, Ilya
imusayev at webmd.net
Thu May 3 19:06:37 UTC 2012
Paul,
Here is a sample of what my list table looks like, just so anyone else who needs to use it can source it as an example
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Channel Label | Operating System | Release | Arch |
|------------------------------|------------------------|---------|--------|
| rhel-x86_64-server-5| redhat-release| 5Server| x86_64|
|------------------------------|------------------------|---------|--------|
| rhel-i386-server-5| redhat-release| 5Server| IA-32|
|------------------------------|------------------------|---------|--------|
| rhel-i386-as-4| redhat-release| 4AS| IA-32|
|------------------------------|------------------------|---------|--------|
| rhel-i386-es-4| redhat-release| 4ES| IA-32|
|------------------------------|------------------------|---------|--------|
| rhel-x86_64-as-4| redhat-release| 4AS| x86_64|
|------------------------------|------------------------|---------|--------|
| rhel-x86_64-es-4| redhat-release| 4ES| x86_64|
|------------------------------|------------------------|---------|--------|
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sorry the copy and paste is not pretty,
Regards,
ilya
________________________________________
From: spacewalk-list-bounces at redhat.com [spacewalk-list-bounces at redhat.com] On Behalf Of Musayev, Ilya [imusayev at webmd.net]
Sent: Thursday, May 03, 2012 2:56 PM
To: spacewalk-list at redhat.com
Subject: Re: [Spacewalk-list] Activation key and "Spacewalk Default"
One more thing to note, the architecture for me is different, meaning I still have 32 and 64 bit but with your script, the i386, i586,i686, ia32 did not work..
I launched to spacecmd, and ran command
softwarechannel_details my-rhel5-32bit-channel
The architecture for 32 bit os was listed as IA-32..
Defining IA-32 worked - just fyi..
Again thanks for the script..
Regards
ilya
-----Original Message-----
From: spacewalk-list-bounces at redhat.com [mailto:spacewalk-list-bounces at redhat.com] On Behalf Of Paul Robert Marino
Sent: Wednesday, May 02, 2012 4:27 PM
To: spacewalk-list at redhat.com
Subject: Re: [Spacewalk-list] Activation key and "Spacewalk Default"
Thanks for the feed back
I wrote the script to handle more than just RHEL so it varies from distro to distro
Arch is fairly consistent
32 bit is almost always = i386
64 bit is almost always = x86_64
there are other Archs like ppc (Power PC Mac) and s390 (IBM Mainframe) but i386 or x86_64 are the ones most people use.
OS changes by distro
RedHat = redhat-release-server
Sientific Linux = sl-release
Release changes by distro and version
RHEL 6.x = 6Server
RHEL 5.x = 5Server
Scientific Linux 6.2 = 6.2
Im honestly not sure what the settings for RHEL 4 should be since i don't ahve any RHEL 4 boxes running in production any more but two have 2 options to figure it out option 1 if you have a box currently registered to redhat network you can get it from the /etc/sysconfig/rhn/systemid file here is an example from RHEL 6 "
<member>
<name>description</name>
<value><string>Initial Registration Parameters:
OS: redhat-release-server
Release: 6Server
CPU Arch: x86_64</string></value>
</member>
"
The second option is you can get it from the spacewalk error logs the error message should appear in /var/log/rhn/rhn_web_api.log and tell you what it tried to register as
On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 2:57 PM, Musayev, Ilya <imusayev at webmd.net> wrote:
> Hi Robert,
>
> Would you please make an example of proper values for --os --release and --arch..
>
> Reason I'm asking, I checked how the release and architecture is displayed under a sinlge system and it seems I could have multiple option.
>
> As of now I have following, which one is correct? What would be a proper entry for RHAS 4 64 and 32 bit and RHEL server 5 32 bit?
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> ------
> | Channel Label | Operating System | Release |
> | Arch |
> |------------------------------|------------------------|---------|--------|
> | rhel-x86_64-server-5| rhel-server| 5|
> | x86_64|
> |------------------------------|------------------------|---------|--------|
> | rhel-x86_64-server-5| rhel| 5|
> | x86_64|
> |------------------------------|------------------------|---------|--------|
> | rhel-x86_64-server-5| redhat-release| 5|
> | x86_64|
> |------------------------------|------------------------|---------|--------|
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> ------
>
> It would help if you can show your --list to see how mapping is done or have another operation that can list what --arch --release and others can be set to.
>
> Thanks
> ilya
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: spacewalk-list-bounces at redhat.com
> [mailto:spacewalk-list-bounces at redhat.com] On Behalf Of Paul Robert
> Marino
> Sent: Tuesday, May 01, 2012 8:08 PM
> To: spacewalk-list at redhat.com
> Subject: Re: [Spacewalk-list] Activation key and "Spacewalk Default"
>
> Its because the channels are not in the default dist map here is my
> tool for setting channels in the default dist map
> https://github.com/prmarino1/Extravehicular-Activity-Admin/blob/master
> /channel-managment/eva-dist-channel-map.pl
>
> Note even though this script uses the published XML RPC APIs for spacewalk to do it this is not considered a supported operation at this time.
> but its worked well for me and i hope it works for you.
> by the way it has an embedded man file that can be extracted using the pod2text or pod2man tools.
> let me know if it helps you
>
>
>
> On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 6:32 PM, Musayev, Ilya <imusayev at webmd.net> wrote:
>> I created several activation keys with "spacewalk default" as an
>> option for a channel. The "Tip" that is allows for systems to
>> register with default Redhat provided channel that corresponds to their installed version.
>>
>>
>>
>> My channels are named identically to what rhn has - i.e.
>> rhel-x86_64-server-5. Why would the system that is being registered
>> does not pick up the channel? I only have 1 base channel that matches this system.
>>
>>
>>
>> I'm using rhel5.7 64 client and spacewalk 1.7
>>
>>
>>
>> Any help is appreciated.
>>
>>
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> ilya
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Spacewalk-list mailing list
>> Spacewalk-list at redhat.com
>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-list
>
> _______________________________________________
> Spacewalk-list mailing list
> Spacewalk-list at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-list
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Spacewalk-list mailing list
> Spacewalk-list at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-list
_______________________________________________
Spacewalk-list mailing list
Spacewalk-list at redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-list
_______________________________________________
Spacewalk-list mailing list
Spacewalk-list at redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-list
More information about the Spacewalk-list
mailing list