[Spacewalk-list] Repo woes

[Thomas Foster]

What's the output of yum repolist ?


On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 4:14 PM, Dimitri Yioulos <dyioulos at onpointfc.com>wrote:

> Thomas,
>
> Yes, and yes.
>
> Dimitri
>
>
> On Monday 05 August 2013 4:00:26 pm Thomas Foster wrote:
> > Did you just add the repo?  If so, did you yum clean
> > metadata?
> >
> > On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 3:41 PM, Lewis Donofrio
> <lewis.donofrio at gmail.com>wrote:
> > > I'm new here but why not use 2nd party Centos repo's
> > > for samba?
> > >
> > > --
> > > _______________________________________________________
> > >____________ https://www.vizify.com/lewis-donofrio -
> > > 734-743-1743
> > >
> > > On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 3:26 PM, Dimitri Yioulos
> <dyioulos at onpointfc.com>wrote:
> > >> H, all.
> > >>
> > >> I recently upgraded Spacewalk to the latest and
> > >> greatest from version 1.8.  Unfortunately, the upgrade
> > >> didn't go well, and all of my settings were lost.  The
> > >> silver lining here is that, by recreating everything,
> > >> I learned a lot (or, at least, refreshed my memory).
> > >>
> > >> However, I'm having a problem getting on recreated
> > >> cahnnel/repo working.  Many of our Linux boxes use
> > >> Samba; the packages come from Sernet.  I created the
> > >> channel and repo for my CentOS 5 systems, but the repo
> > >> won't sync. When I try to sync from the command line,
> > >> here's the output I get:
> > >>
> > >> spacewalk-repo-sync --channel sernet-samba-el5 --type
> > >> yum Repo URL:
> > >> http://ftp.sernet.de/pub/samba/3.6/rhel/5 Packages in
> > >> repo:                22
> > >> Packages already synced:          0
> > >> Packages to sync:                22
> > >> 1/22 : samba3-utils-3.6.17-45.el5-0.x86_64
> > >> 2/22 : samba3-winbind-3.6.17-45.el5-0.x86_64
> > >> 3/22 : libsmbclient-devel-3.6.17-45.el5-0.x86_64
> > >> 4/22 : libwbclient0-32bit-3.6.17-45.el5-0.i386
> > >> 5/22 : libwbclient-devel-3.6.17-45.el5-0.x86_64
> > >> 6/22 : samba3-doc-3.6.17-45.el5-0.x86_64
> > >> 7/22 : libwbclient0-3.6.17-45.el5-0.x86_64
> > >> 8/22 : samba3-3.6.17-45.el5-0.x86_64
> > >> 9/22 : samba3-debuginfo-3.6.17-45.el5-0.x86_64
> > >> 10/22 : samba3-client-3.6.17-45.el5-0.x86_64
> > >> 11/22 : libsmbclient0-3.6.17-45.el5-0.x86_64
> > >> 12/22 : samba3-winbind-32bit-3.6.17-45.el5-0.i386
> > >> 13/22 : samba3-winbind-3.6.17-45.el5-0.i386
> > >> 14/22 : libwbclient0-3.6.17-45.el5-0.i386
> > >> 15/22 : samba3-3.6.17-45.el5-0.i386
> > >> 16/22 : samba3-client-3.6.17-45.el5-0.i386
> > >> 17/22 : samba3-debuginfo-3.6.17-45.el5-0.i386
> > >> 18/22 : libsmbclient-devel-3.6.17-45.el5-0.i386
> > >> 19/22 : samba3-doc-3.6.17-45.el5-0.i386
> > >> 20/22 : libsmbclient0-3.6.17-45.el5-0.i386
> > >> 21/22 : samba3-utils-3.6.17-45.el5-0.i386
> > >> 22/22 : libwbclient-devel-3.6.17-45.el5-0.i386
> > >> Linking packages to channel.
> > >> ERROR: Package arch x86_64 incompatible with channel
> > >> sernet-samba-el5
> > >> Sync completed.
> > >> Total time: 0:00:06
> > >>
> > >> The machines to be updated are 32-bit.  I chose IA-32
> > >> as the Architecture, and the repo url is
> > >> http://ftp.sernet.de/pub/samba/3.6/rhel/5.  If I make
> > >> it http://ftp.sernet.de/pub/samba/3.6/rhel/5/i386, I
> > >> get "ERROR: Cannot retrieve repository metadata
> > >> (repomd.xml) for repostory: sernet-samba-el5. Please
> > >> verify its path and try again.
> > >>
> > >> What's frustrating is that I did have this working
> > >> before. Any help would be greatly appreciated.
> > >>
> > >> Dimitri
> > >>
> > >> --
> > >> This message has been scanned for viruses and
> > >> dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
> > >> believed to be clean.
> > >>
> > >> _______________________________________________
> > >> Spacewalk-list mailing list
> > >> Spacewalk-list at redhat.com
> > >> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-list
> > >
> > > --
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Spacewalk-list mailing list
> > > Spacewalk-list at redhat.com
> > > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-list
>
>
>
> --
> This message has been scanned for viruses and
> dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
> believed to be clean.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Spacewalk-list mailing list
> Spacewalk-list at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-list
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/spacewalk-list/attachments/20130805/0101c749/attachment.htm>