[Spacewalk-list] Repo woes
Dimitri Yioulos
dyioulos at onpointfc.com
Tue Aug 6 12:45:53 UTC 2013
Thanks for the reply, Paul.
Unfortunately, that doesn't seem to be the case for me. If
I run the sync from the command line, it completes in
seconds with the X86_64 error message (syncing from the GUI
also doesn't work, obviously). Also, in the "Full Software
Channel List", while other channels show the number of
packages acquired during the sync, the Samba channel shows
a zero. It seems I've tried every combination of entry
when creating the channel/repo, and it errors, one way or
the other. What really ticks me off is that I once had the
channel working. I just don't remember how. Arrrrgh!
Dimitri
On Monday 05 August 2013 7:07:18 pm Paul Robert Marino
wrote:
> The error message isn't wrong the repo on the site is
> just strange. All that means is it can't sync the X86_64
> packages so it will ignore them the rest should sync
> fine.
>
> I get the same error from HP's ProLiant repos because it
> contains source rpms however the channels in spacewalk
> still work despite the errors.
>
>
>
> -- Sent from my HP Pre3
>
> On Aug 5, 2013 18:10, Thomas Foster
> <thomas.foster80 at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> change the architecture to x86_64 for the repo..then try
> and sync
>
>
> On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 4:50 PM, Dimitri Yioulos
> <dyioulos at onpointfc.com> wrote:
>
> On the Spacewalk server?
>
> With respect, what difference should it make? The
> Spacewalk server is built on CentOS 6, but has Spacewalk
> repos for CentOS 5 that sync just fine.
>
> Dimitri
>
> On Monday 05 August 2013 4:34:10 pm Thomas Foster wrote:
> > What's the output of yum repolist ?
> >
> > On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 4:14 PM, Dimitri Yioulos
>
> <dyioulos at onpointfc.com>wrote:
> > > Thomas,
> > >
> > > Yes, and yes.
> > >
> > > Dimitri
> > >
> > > On Monday 05 August 2013 4:00:26 pm Thomas Foster
wrote:
> > > > Did you just add the repo? If so, did you yum
> > > > clean metadata?
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 3:41 PM, Lewis Donofrio
> > >
> > > <lewis.donofrio at gmail.com>wrote:
> > > > > I'm new here but why not use 2nd party Centos
> > > > > repo's for samba?
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > ________________________________________________
> > > > >___
> > > > >
> > > > >____ ____________
> > > > >
> > > > > https://www.vizify.com/lewis-donofrio -
> > > > >
> > > > > 734-743-1743
> > > > >
> > > > > On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 3:26 PM, Dimitri Yioulos
> > >
> > > <dyioulos at onpointfc.com>wrote:
> > > > >> H, all.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> I recently upgraded Spacewalk to the latest and
> > > > >> greatest from version 1.8. Unfortunately, the
> > > > >> upgrade didn't go well, and all of my settings
> > > > >> were lost. The silver lining here is that, by
> > > > >> recreating everything, I learned a lot (or, at
> > > > >> least, refreshed my memory).
> > > > >>
> > > > >> However, I'm having a problem getting on
> > > > >> recreated cahnnel/repo working. Many of our
> > > > >> Linux boxes use Samba; the packages come from
> > > > >> Sernet. I created the channel and repo for my
> > > > >> CentOS 5 systems, but the repo won't sync. When
> > > > >> I try to sync from the command line, here's the
> > > > >> output I get:
> > > > >>
> > > > >> spacewalk-repo-sync --channel sernet-samba-el5
> > > > >> --type yum Repo URL:
> > > > >> http://ftp.sernet.de/pub/samba/3.6/rhel/5
> > > > >> Packages in repo: 22
> > > > >> Packages already synced: 0
> > > > >> Packages to sync: 22
> > > > >> 1/22 : samba3-utils-3.6.17-45.el5-0.x86_64
> > > > >> 2/22 : samba3-winbind-3.6.17-45.el5-0.x86_64
> > > > >> 3/22 :
> > > > >> libsmbclient-devel-3.6.17-45.el5-0.x86_64 4/22
> > > > >> : libwbclient0-32bit-3.6.17-45.el5-0.i386 5/22
> > > > >> : libwbclient-devel-3.6.17-45.el5-0.x86_64 6/22
> > > > >> : samba3-doc-3.6.17-45.el5-0.x86_64 7/22 :
> > > > >> libwbclient0-3.6.17-45.el5-0.x86_64 8/22 :
> > > > >> samba3-3.6.17-45.el5-0.x86_64
> > > > >> 9/22 : samba3-debuginfo-3.6.17-45.el5-0.x86_64
> > > > >> 10/22 : samba3-client-3.6.17-45.el5-0.x86_64
> > > > >> 11/22 : libsmbclient0-3.6.17-45.el5-0.x86_64
> > > > >> 12/22 :
> > > > >> samba3-winbind-32bit-3.6.17-45.el5-0.i386 13/22
> > > > >> : samba3-winbind-3.6.17-45.el5-0.i386 14/22 :
> > > > >> libwbclient0-3.6.17-45.el5-0.i386 15/22 :
> > > > >> samba3-3.6.17-45.el5-0.i386
> > > > >> 16/22 : samba3-client-3.6.17-45.el5-0.i386
> > > > >> 17/22 : samba3-debuginfo-3.6.17-45.el5-0.i386
> > > > >> 18/22 : libsmbclient-devel-3.6.17-45.el5-0.i386
> > > > >> 19/22 : samba3-doc-3.6.17-45.el5-0.i386
> > > > >> 20/22 : libsmbclient0-3.6.17-45.el5-0.i386
> > > > >> 21/22 : samba3-utils-3.6.17-45.el5-0.i386
> > > > >> 22/22 : libwbclient-devel-3.6.17-45.el5-0.i386
> > > > >> Linking packages to channel.
> > > > >> ERROR: Package arch x86_64 incompatible with
> > > > >> channel sernet-samba-el5
> > > > >> Sync completed.
> > > > >> Total time: 0:00:06
> > > > >>
> > > > >> The machines to be updated are 32-bit. I chose
> > > > >> IA-32 as the Architecture, and the repo url is
> > > > >> http://ftp.sernet.de/pub/samba/3.6/rhel/5. If
> > > > >> I make it
> > > > >> http://ftp.sernet.de/pub/samba/3.6/rhel/5/i386,
> > > > >> I get "ERROR: Cannot retrieve repository
> > > > >> metadata (repomd.xml) for repostory:
> > > > >> sernet-samba-el5. Please verify its path and
> > > > >> try again.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> What's frustrating is that I did have this
> > > > >> working before. Any help would be greatly
> > > > >> appreciated.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Dimitri
> > > > >>
> > > > >> --
> > > > >> This message has been scanned for viruses and
> > > > >> dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
> > > > >> believed to be clean.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> _______________________________________________
> > > > >> Spacewalk-list mailing list
> > > > >> Spacewalk-list at redhat.com
> > > > >> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewa
> > > > >>lk- list
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > Spacewalk-list mailing list
> > > > > Spacewalk-list at redhat.com
> > > > > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewal
> > > > >k-l ist
> > >
> > > --
> > > This message has been scanned for viruses and
> > > dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
> > > believed to be clean.
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Spacewalk-list mailing list
> > > Spacewalk-list at redhat.com
> > > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-li
> > >st
>
> --
> This message has been scanned for viruses and
> dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
> believed to be clean.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Spacewalk-list mailing list
> Spacewalk-list at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-list
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
More information about the Spacewalk-list
mailing list