[Spacewalk-list] 1.6 to 1.7 upgrade bug 869985 reappeared?

Jason M. Nielsen jnielsen at myriad.com
Tue Aug 13 18:44:31 UTC 2013


Just thought Id note that the 1.6 to 1.8 upgrade worked with one 
exception unrelated directly to spacewalk. The default oracle database 
was set to 150 processes so during a date stamp change of the schema 
upgrade the whole process hung.  The DBAs allowed 1200 processes and a 
restart of the upgrade finished without a hitch.

Thanks again for the help and information.


On 08/12/2013 10:08 AM, Jason Nielsen wrote:
> If I understand you correct you are saying I can upgrade from 1.6 directly to 1.8? I thought it was required to do a step by step upgrade. My objective is to get all the way to 2.0.
> ________________________________________
> From: spacewalk-list-bounces at redhat.com [spacewalk-list-bounces at redhat.com] on behalf of Milan Zazrivec [mzazrivec at redhat.com]
> Sent: Monday, August 12, 2013 9:56 AM
> To: spacewalk-list at redhat.com
> Subject: Re: [Spacewalk-list] 1.6 to 1.7 upgrade bug 869985 reappeared?
>
>> I am attempting to upgrade from 1.6 to 1.7 and have encountered the
>> following:
>>
>> 'SPACEWALK-SCHEMA-1.6-TO-SPACEWALK-SCHEMA-1.7/007-RHNPACKAGEGROUP-TRIM.SQ
>> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> spacewalk-schema-1.6-to-spacewalk-schema-1.7/007-rhnPackageGroup-trim.sql
>>
>>
>> 77722 rows updated.
>>
>> update rhnpackagegroup set name = substr(name, 1, length(name)-1)
>> *
>> ERROR at line 1:
>> ORA-00001: unique constraint (SPACEWALK.RHN_PACKAGE_GROUP_NAME_UQ) violated
>>
>>
>> This appears to be a bug listed as fixed.
>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=869985
>>
>> Presuming it is the same issue clearly its not fixed or the repo has
>> somehow reverted back which seems very unlikely. I am using
>> spacewalk-repo-1.7-5.el5 pulled from
>> http://yum.spacewalkproject.org/1.7/RHEL/5/x86_64/. Following the
>> directions at https://fedorahosted.org/spacewalk/wiki/HowToUpgrade17.
>
> Yes, this bug was fixed for Spacewalk 1.8, i.e. you would not hit this
> problem when upgrading from any version to Spacewalk 1.8. The problem
> has not been backported to Spacewalk 1.7 packages, i.e. you either
> can upgrade to something later or apply that fix manually.
>
> -Milan Zázrivec
>
> _______________________________________________
> Spacewalk-list mailing list
> Spacewalk-list at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-list
>
> _______________________________________________
> Spacewalk-list mailing list
> Spacewalk-list at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-list
>




More information about the Spacewalk-list mailing list