[Spacewalk-list] packages "not upgrades "

Paul Robert Marino prmarino1 at gmail.com
Tue Jan 22 22:46:44 UTC 2013


If it works I have to ask the question was this patch submitted in a
ticket in the spacewalk bugzilla


On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 2:38 PM, Mgr. Peter Hudec <peter.hudec at swan.sk> wrote:
> Hi Simon,
>
> see attahcech diff, which solved my problem. It's against SPACEWALK-1.7
> branch.
>
>         Peter
>
>
> On 1/21/13 5:59 PM, Mgr. Peter Hudec wrote:
>>
>> Hi Simon,
>>
>> yes, it did the upgeades ;)
>>
>> I found the problem.
>> First, this is apt-get/aptitude fature, the python-apt api did not have
>> this strange behaviour.
>>
>> Second where is the problem. The problem is with the wrong generated
>> Packages file. Exctly wit the information provided for the package.
>>
>> Every package has control file, where is the package description. Thos
>> control file shuld be transported to the repository Packages file and
>> here is the problem.
>>
>> In my case
>>
>> Package pss-foxim fdo not have property "Installed-Size", but the
>> Packages does. If i remove the line form packages this packages goes ok.
>>
>> Package strace have "Installed-Size: property, but the value differs
>> with the value in the Packages file. If i correct the value in the
>> Packages file, this package gos OK.
>>
>> So generaly, the DebpackageWrites should follow thr package control file.
>>
>> So the problem is in Pacakge writer java class and in the rhnpush and
>> it's XMLRPC API ;(
>>
>>
>> I hope I will be able to write quick fix for this problem.
>>
>>      best regards
>>          Peter
>>
>> On 1/21/13 4:44 PM, Simon Lukasik wrote:
>>>
>>> On 01/21/2013 02:02 PM, Mgr. Peter Hudec wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Dear all,
>>>>
>>>> today I found a strange issue.
>>>> I out some packages into repository and installed then using spacewalk
>>>> server.
>>>>
>>>> These packages were successfully installed, the spacewalk shows the
>>>> system is up2date and OK.
>>>>
>>>> But when I run "apt-get upgrade -s" the system still wants to upgrade
>>>> the packages, even if they are the same version. Does anybody already
>>>> had this issue?
>>>>
>>>> TEJB1139H5XEAS info # apt-get upgrade -s
>>>> Reading package lists... Done
>>>> Building dependency tree
>>>> Reading state information... Done
>>>> The following packages will be upgraded:
>>>>    pss-foxim strace worthless
>>>> 3 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded.
>>>> Inst pss-foxim [2.1] (2.1 spacewalk.fopss.sk [all])
>>>> Conf pss-foxim (2.1 spacewalk.fopss.sk [all])
>>>> Inst strace [4.5.20-2.3ubuntu1] (4.5.20-2.3ubuntu1 spacewalk.fopss.sk
>>>> [i386])
>>>> Inst worthless [1.0-2] (1.0-2 spacewalk.fopss.sk [all])
>>>> Conf strace (4.5.20-2.3ubuntu1 spacewalk.fopss.sk [i386])
>>>> Conf worthless (1.0-2 spacewalk.fopss.sk [all])
>>>>
>>>
>>> Does the `apt-get upgrade` (without the --simulate option) really
>>> performs that actions?
>>>
>>> And can you confirm that this issue persists even after `apt-get update`?
>>>
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Spacewalk-list mailing list
> Spacewalk-list at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-list




More information about the Spacewalk-list mailing list