[Spacewalk-list] How can my CentOS 6.5 be up to date?

[Waldirio Manhães Pinheiro]

Daryl

Remove /etc/sysconfig/rhn/systemid file and try again.

B'Regards

______________
Atenciosamente
Waldirio
msn: waldirio at gmail.com
Skype: waldirio
Site: www.waldirio.com.br
Blog: blog.waldirio.com.br
LinkedIn: http://br.linkedin.com/pub/waldirio-pinheiro/22/b21/646
PGP: www.waldirio.com.br/public.html

On Fri, Nov 7, 2014 at 2:22 PM, Daryl Rose <rosede12 at gmail.com> wrote:

> How can I unregistered this server and clean up all references to the SW
> server?   I removed the server from SW itself, but if I do a yum repolist I
> get errors about an invalid registration.  I want to start over with a
> clean system.
>
> Thanks
>
> Daryl
>
>
> On Fri, Nov 7, 2014 at 8:15 AM, Stephen Herr <sherr at redhat.com> wrote:
>
>> The question Spacewalk is asking / answering when it shows you updates
>> available to your system is "Are there any newer versions of packages
>> installed on this system in channels this system is subscribed to".
>>
>> In your case, if the 6.5 client is subscribed to a 6.5 channel that only
>> has packages up through 6.5 in it, then everything will be up to date. The
>> fact that 6.6 has been released somewhere else is not relevant, what
>> matters is what's in the channel and what's on the system.
>>
>> -Stepehn
>>
>> On 11/06/2014 10:59 AM, Daryl Rose wrote:
>>
>>> Michael,
>>>
>>> I'm not sure that I understand your response.  The client is CentOS 6.5,
>>> not 6.6. Yes, the Spacewalk server is 6.6, but the client is 6.5.  I
>>> purposefully chose 6.5 because its an older release and I know there are
>>> a number of packages that would be out of date.
>>>
>>> Thank you
>>>
>>> Daryl
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 9:44 AM, Michael Mraka <michael.mraka at redhat.com
>>> <mailto:michael.mraka at redhat.com>> wrote:
>>>
>>>     Daryl Rose wrote:
>>>     % I just recently installed Spacewalk on a CentOS 6.6 server.   I
>>>     created a
>>>     % 6.5 channel and repository and I just stood up a CentOS 6.5 client
>>>     server
>>>     % and registered it on to the Spacewalk server.
>>>     %
>>>     % When I initially stood up the 6.5 client, I looked to see how many
>>>     how many
>>>     % updated packages it needed by doing a "yum update".  It needed 264
>>>     % packages, however, I DID NOT perform the update.  Just looking.  I
>>>     then
>>>     % registered the 6.5 client with the Spacewalk server and checked to
>>>     see if
>>>     % it was up to date or not.  Spacewalk is telling me that the client
>>> is
>>>     % up-to-date.  This is not accurate, why?
>>>
>>>     So you have CentOS 6.5 client registered to CentOS 6.5 channel in
>>>     Spacewalk.
>>>     And Spacewalk UI says it's up-to-date. Why do you think it isn't
>>>     accurate?
>>>
>>>     If you don't have 6.6 packages in Spacewalk then it can hardly know
>>>     about updates.
>>>
>>>     % Thanks.
>>>     %
>>>     % Daryl
>>>
>>>     Regards,
>>>
>>>     --
>>>     Michael Mráka
>>>     Satellite Engineering, Red Hat
>>>
>>>     _______________________________________________
>>>     Spacewalk-list mailing list
>>>     Spacewalk-list at redhat.com <mailto:Spacewalk-list at redhat.com>
>>>     https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-list
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Spacewalk-list mailing list
>>> Spacewalk-list at redhat.com
>>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-list
>>>
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Spacewalk-list mailing list
>> Spacewalk-list at redhat.com
>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-list
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Spacewalk-list mailing list
> Spacewalk-list at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-list
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/spacewalk-list/attachments/20141107/17e1b1c8/attachment.htm>