[Spacewalk-list] How to properly setup Solaris Channels

Fri Nov 14 16:18:12 UTC 2014

Yes Daryl you must subscribe to both channels. You may be subscribed to one
base channel and as many of that base's children as you wish.

-Ethan
On Nov 14, 2014 10:14 AM, "Daryl Rose" <rosede12 at gmail.com> wrote:

> Waldirio,
>
> Would you please clarify that comment?  Are you telling me to create a
> base channel and a child channel, and then subscribe to the child channel?
>
> Thanks
>
> Daryl
>
>
> On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 5:37 PM, Waldirio Manhães Pinheiro <
> waldirio at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Daryl
>>
>> Child channel yes, Base channel no!
>>
>> Take care
>> Em 13/11/2014 17:43, "Daryl Rose" <rosede12 at gmail.com> escreveu:
>>
>>> Can I register the same client to two different channels?
>>>
>>> Thank you
>>>
>>> Daryl
>>>
>>> On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 11:13 AM, Ethan Bonick <ethan.bonick at truqua.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> You shouldn’t have to do that. I have mine set up as separate channels
>>>> on CentOS and they work independently. I would try out the Solaris if I had
>>>> the time, but I don’t. I also don’t know Solaris really all that much,
>>>> hopefully someone else can chime in.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>>
>>>> [image:
>>>> https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/pPQYWyEgd3U9tfRSLCOfyEAjztZRe-j4nPYRdMYrN6FGIZFJEo-O3D-nQ5mhhJA1aetmO-GtoGO7U3mYiw2fDUZIGYNtR5ifQ4hOE_g1rRE0sUqsJlk]
>>>>
>>>> *Ethan Bonick** | Information Technology *
>>>> *TruQua*
>>>> Mobile 630.445.9313
>>>> Office 312.525.8790
>>>>
>>>> *CONFIDENTIAL:  *This e-mail and any attachments are confidential and
>>>> may be protected by legal privilege. If you are not the intended recipient,
>>>> be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of this e-mail
>>>> or any attachment is prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error,
>>>> please reply and notify the sender and delete this copy from your system.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> *From:* spacewalk-list-bounces at redhat.com [mailto:
>>>> spacewalk-list-bounces at redhat.com] *On Behalf Of *Daryl Rose
>>>> *Sent:* Thursday, November 13, 2014 10:56 AM
>>>> *To:* spacewalk-list at redhat.com
>>>> *Subject:* Re: [Spacewalk-list] How to properly setup Solaris Channels
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Ethan,
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> To answer your questions, yes. Yes, I ran the rhn_check -vv on the
>>>> client server, and yes the server had checked in.  So, the updates channel
>>>> was a child of the base, so when I re-registered the client, it should have
>>>> known about the child because it was part of the activation key.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I've since blown away the base channel and the child channel and
>>>> combined everything into a single channel. I know see that there are over
>>>> 900 updates available, which should be pretty accurate, however, I don't
>>>> like all of patches and packages intermixed.  It makes it difficult to
>>>> figure out whats what.  however, that is how the CentOS channel is, all
>>>> three repositories combined into a single large list, so maybe I just have
>>>> to get used to it.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Thanks
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Daryl
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 9:58 AM, Ethan Bonick <ethan.bonick at truqua.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Have you run an rhn_check or has the server checked in get to get the
>>>> new channel config? My guess would be it doesn't know about the channel
>>>> yet. When you re-registered did you make sure the child channel is
>>>> subscribed to by the base channel? I know some of it is low level and you
>>>> might have checked already, but never hurts to ask. Also did you remove the
>>>> repo or just the channel?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> *Ethan Bonick | *Information Technology
>>>> *TruQua*
>>>>
>>>> *CONFIDENTIAL:  *This e-mail and any attachments are confidential and
>>>> may be protected by legal privilege. If you are not the intended recipient,
>>>> be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of this e-mail
>>>> or any attachment is prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error,
>>>> please reply and notify the sender and delete this copy from your system.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 8:21 AM, Daryl Rose <rosede12 at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> When I initially setup Solaris, I did just a single channel just for
>>>> patches.  However, I decided that I want to also have a base channel as
>>>> well.  Currently, if I want to add a new package to a Solaris server, I
>>>> have to either pop a dvd into the drive, or NFS an ISO image.  However,
>>>> this is what SW is for.  A repository of all of the packages, plus updates
>>>> that may need to be applied.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I made a new base channel and imported all of the installation packages
>>>> into it.   However, I already had an update channel with a system assigned
>>>> to it.  What I am trying to figure out is; what is the correct way to set
>>>> up the two channels?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I removed the updates channel, and recreated it as a child of the base
>>>> channel.  I had previously removed the subscribed system, so I resubscribed
>>>> to the base channel.  There are over 2000 packages in the base channel, and
>>>> 381 in the updates channel.  I thought that once I resubscribed the server
>>>> to the base/child updates channel, I would see needed updates. I know that
>>>> there should be 80 updates needed on this server, however, SW tells me that
>>>> the system is up to date.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> When I setup the CentOS Channel, I created three repositories:  Base,
>>>> Updates and Extra's.   All three are then assigned to the CentOS channel.
>>>> There are now over 8000 packages available for the CentOS server.  Is best
>>>> practice to put *ALL *base packages and updates together in a single
>>>> channel so that way the Solaris server can see everything?  Why doesn't the
>>>> client server see the child channel and SW tell me that it needs updates?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Thank you.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Daryl
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Spacewalk-list mailing list
>>>> Spacewalk-list at redhat.com
>>>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-list
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Spacewalk-list mailing list
>>>> Spacewalk-list at redhat.com
>>>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-list
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Spacewalk-list mailing list
>>>> Spacewalk-list at redhat.com
>>>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-list
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Spacewalk-list mailing list
>>> Spacewalk-list at redhat.com
>>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-list
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Spacewalk-list mailing list
>> Spacewalk-list at redhat.com
>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-list
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Spacewalk-list mailing list
> Spacewalk-list at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-list
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/spacewalk-list/attachments/20141114/53656e12/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.gif
Type: image/gif
Size: 2038 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/spacewalk-list/attachments/20141114/53656e12/attachment.gif>