[Spacewalk-list] How to properly setup Solaris Channels

Fri Nov 14 17:22:53 UTC 2014

Daryk

Can you post some pics in the web ?!

If you prefer, can send me directly by email.

B'Regards

______________
Atenciosamente
Waldirio
msn: waldirio at gmail.com
Skype: waldirio
Site: www.waldirio.com.br
Blog: blog.waldirio.com.br
LinkedIn: http://br.linkedin.com/pub/waldirio-pinheiro/22/b21/646
PGP: www.waldirio.com.br/public.html

On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 3:13 PM, Daryl Rose <rosede12 at gmail.com> wrote:

> Waldirio,
>
> I just realized that the example that you provided me was a channel and
> repositories.  That is exactly how I have the CentOS channel setup.  A
> single channel with three repositories.
>
> Solaris doesn't have repositories that I can draw from that is why I am
> adding the packages and patches to the channel(s).
>
> Thanks.
>
> Daryl
>
>
>
> On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 10:14 AM, Waldirio Manhães Pinheiro <
> waldirio at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Daryl, good afternoon
>>
>> Sure, no problem. Take a look in
>> https://www.redhat.com/archives/spacewalk-list/2014-October/msg00222.html
>> .
>>
>> You can create in your environment different's base channels, for example:
>>
>> B centos6.4
>>
>> B centos6.5
>>
>> B centos6.6
>>
>> You can subscribe your client just in one Base Channel, only centos6.4 or
>> centos6.5 or centos6.6, although you can use epel, flash, vmwaretools, so
>> you can create child channels, like example bellow:
>>
>> B centos6.4
>>      | -- epel_6_x86-64
>>      | -- vmware_tools_6_x86-64
>>      | -- xpto_6_x86-64
>>
>> B centos6.5
>>
>> B centos6.6
>>
>> Now, if you have you client subscribed in centos6.4, you can sign too
>> child channels (epel, vmware and xpto).
>>
>> Make sense to you ?!
>>
>> Let me know !!
>>
>> B'Regards
>>
>>
>> ______________
>> Atenciosamente
>> Waldirio
>> msn: waldirio at gmail.com
>> Skype: waldirio
>> Site: www.waldirio.com.br
>> Blog: blog.waldirio.com.br
>> LinkedIn: http://br.linkedin.com/pub/waldirio-pinheiro/22/b21/646
>> PGP: www.waldirio.com.br/public.html
>>
>> On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 2:02 PM, Daryl Rose <rosede12 at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Waldirio,
>>>
>>> Would you please clarify that comment?  Are you telling me to create a
>>> base channel and a child channel, and then subscribe to the child channel?
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>>
>>> Daryl
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 5:37 PM, Waldirio Manhães Pinheiro <
>>> waldirio at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Daryl
>>>>
>>>> Child channel yes, Base channel no!
>>>>
>>>> Take care
>>>> Em 13/11/2014 17:43, "Daryl Rose" <rosede12 at gmail.com> escreveu:
>>>>
>>>>> Can I register the same client to two different channels?
>>>>>
>>>>> Thank you
>>>>>
>>>>> Daryl
>>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 11:13 AM, Ethan Bonick <
>>>>> ethan.bonick at truqua.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> You shouldn’t have to do that. I have mine set up as separate
>>>>>> channels on CentOS and they work independently. I would try out the Solaris
>>>>>> if I had the time, but I don’t. I also don’t know Solaris really all that
>>>>>> much, hopefully someone else can chime in.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> [image:
>>>>>> https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/pPQYWyEgd3U9tfRSLCOfyEAjztZRe-j4nPYRdMYrN6FGIZFJEo-O3D-nQ5mhhJA1aetmO-GtoGO7U3mYiw2fDUZIGYNtR5ifQ4hOE_g1rRE0sUqsJlk]
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *Ethan Bonick** | Information Technology *
>>>>>> *TruQua*
>>>>>> Mobile 630.445.9313
>>>>>> Office 312.525.8790
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *CONFIDENTIAL:  *This e-mail and any attachments are confidential
>>>>>> and may be protected by legal privilege. If you are not the intended
>>>>>> recipient, be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of
>>>>>> this e-mail or any attachment is prohibited. If you have received this
>>>>>> e-mail in error, please reply and notify the sender and delete this copy
>>>>>> from your system.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *From:* spacewalk-list-bounces at redhat.com [mailto:
>>>>>> spacewalk-list-bounces at redhat.com] *On Behalf Of *Daryl Rose
>>>>>> *Sent:* Thursday, November 13, 2014 10:56 AM
>>>>>> *To:* spacewalk-list at redhat.com
>>>>>> *Subject:* Re: [Spacewalk-list] How to properly setup Solaris
>>>>>> Channels
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Ethan,
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> To answer your questions, yes. Yes, I ran the rhn_check -vv on the
>>>>>> client server, and yes the server had checked in.  So, the updates channel
>>>>>> was a child of the base, so when I re-registered the client, it should have
>>>>>> known about the child because it was part of the activation key.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I've since blown away the base channel and the child channel and
>>>>>> combined everything into a single channel. I know see that there are over
>>>>>> 900 updates available, which should be pretty accurate, however, I don't
>>>>>> like all of patches and packages intermixed.  It makes it difficult to
>>>>>> figure out whats what.  however, that is how the CentOS channel is, all
>>>>>> three repositories combined into a single large list, so maybe I just have
>>>>>> to get used to it.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Daryl
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 9:58 AM, Ethan Bonick <
>>>>>> ethan.bonick at truqua.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Have you run an rhn_check or has the server checked in get to get the
>>>>>> new channel config? My guess would be it doesn't know about the channel
>>>>>> yet. When you re-registered did you make sure the child channel is
>>>>>> subscribed to by the base channel? I know some of it is low level and you
>>>>>> might have checked already, but never hurts to ask. Also did you remove the
>>>>>> repo or just the channel?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *Ethan Bonick | *Information Technology
>>>>>> *TruQua*
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *CONFIDENTIAL:  *This e-mail and any attachments are confidential
>>>>>> and may be protected by legal privilege. If you are not the intended
>>>>>> recipient, be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of
>>>>>> this e-mail or any attachment is prohibited. If you have received this
>>>>>> e-mail in error, please reply and notify the sender and delete this copy
>>>>>> from your system.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 8:21 AM, Daryl Rose <rosede12 at gmail.com>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> When I initially setup Solaris, I did just a single channel just for
>>>>>> patches.  However, I decided that I want to also have a base channel as
>>>>>> well.  Currently, if I want to add a new package to a Solaris server, I
>>>>>> have to either pop a dvd into the drive, or NFS an ISO image.  However,
>>>>>> this is what SW is for.  A repository of all of the packages, plus updates
>>>>>> that may need to be applied.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I made a new base channel and imported all of the installation
>>>>>> packages into it.   However, I already had an update channel with a system
>>>>>> assigned to it.  What I am trying to figure out is; what is the correct way
>>>>>> to set up the two channels?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I removed the updates channel, and recreated it as a child of the
>>>>>> base channel.  I had previously removed the subscribed system, so I
>>>>>> resubscribed to the base channel.  There are over 2000 packages in the base
>>>>>> channel, and 381 in the updates channel.  I thought that once I
>>>>>> resubscribed the server to the base/child updates channel, I would see
>>>>>> needed updates. I know that there should be 80 updates needed on this
>>>>>> server, however, SW tells me that the system is up to date.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> When I setup the CentOS Channel, I created three repositories:  Base,
>>>>>> Updates and Extra's.   All three are then assigned to the CentOS channel.
>>>>>> There are now over 8000 packages available for the CentOS server.  Is best
>>>>>> practice to put *ALL *base packages and updates together in a single
>>>>>> channel so that way the Solaris server can see everything?  Why doesn't the
>>>>>> client server see the child channel and SW tell me that it needs updates?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thank you.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Daryl
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> Spacewalk-list mailing list
>>>>>> Spacewalk-list at redhat.com
>>>>>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-list
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> Spacewalk-list mailing list
>>>>>> Spacewalk-list at redhat.com
>>>>>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-list
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> Spacewalk-list mailing list
>>>>>> Spacewalk-list at redhat.com
>>>>>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-list
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Spacewalk-list mailing list
>>>>> Spacewalk-list at redhat.com
>>>>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-list
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Spacewalk-list mailing list
>>>> Spacewalk-list at redhat.com
>>>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-list
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Spacewalk-list mailing list
>>> Spacewalk-list at redhat.com
>>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-list
>>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Spacewalk-list mailing list
>> Spacewalk-list at redhat.com
>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-list
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Spacewalk-list mailing list
> Spacewalk-list at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-list
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/spacewalk-list/attachments/20141114/71f14bde/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.gif
Type: image/gif
Size: 2038 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/spacewalk-list/attachments/20141114/71f14bde/attachment.gif>