[Spacewalk-list] FW: What does ULN gives you that standard oracle public yum doesn't

Paul Robert Marino prmarino1 at gmail.com
Sat Aug 27 20:56:11 UTC 2016


Avi,
thanks for the clarification.

On Sat, Aug 27, 2016 at 3:51 PM, Avi Miller <avi.miller at oracle.com> wrote:

> Two points I'll make while I'm on leave and not really checking email. :)
>
> 1. There is no purposeful delay between ULN and the public repos, beyond
> the sync process to our Akamai mirrors. In practice, this can be between
> 1-4 hours.
>
> 2. ULN is fully supported with Spacewalk, both in our build and upstream.
> We document specifically how to create ULN-based repos and how to provide
> ULN credentials for the sync process.
>
> Other than that, ULN has additional channels that are not available on
> yum.oracle.com. Some contain non Open Source software. I usually advocate
> a mix of both, depending on your needs, as yum.oracle.com can be faster
> (as it's served by Akamai), but ULN can be more efficient by using the
> base/patch channel combos.
>
> Shameless plug: I'm doing a hands-on lab at OpenWorld 2016 that covers all
> this on Spacewalk 2.4. If you're attending OpenWorld, you should come check
> it out. :)
>
> Sent from my iPad
>
> On 26 Aug 2016, at 6:48 PM, Paul Robert Marino <prmarino1 at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> Well that's part of the support thing. they put a delay on the updating to
> the public repos.
> on a side note since oracle considers spacewalk to be its official package
> management tool im willing to bet there is a way to get it to work with ULN
> just like how you can get the official red Hat channels to sync to
> spacewalk even though its unsupported.
>
> On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 3:52 PM, NZ Asparona Technical Support (NZ -
> Auckland) <technical.support at asparona.com> wrote:
>
>> Thanks for an interesting response,
>>
>>
>>
>> However the question was more technical rather legislative, assuming that
>> we have support and have a choice either to use ULN or Yum.
>>
>>
>>
>> Found that clarification by Avi:
>>
>>
>>
>> https://community.oracle.com/docs/DOC-921379
>>
>> … Some repository content, such as content for the update-level specific
>> patch is available from ULN but not from the Oracle public yum server,
>> while other repository content, such as content for the Spacewalk Client
>> and Spacewalk Server channels, can be populated from the Oracle public yum
>> server but not from ULN…
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* spacewalk-list-bounces at redhat.com [mailto:spacewalk-list-bounces
>> @redhat.com] *On Behalf Of *Avi Miller
>> *Sent:* Wednesday, February 24, 2016 8:55 AM
>> *To:* spacewalk-list at redhat.com
>> *Subject:* Re: [Spacewalk-list] base patch or latest
>>
>>
>>
>> … Some more general advice: use ULN only for the base/patch channels
>> (and the non-open Oracle channels like Ksplice, when you get access to
>> them). The rest of the channels you should sync from yum.oracle.com because
>> it's hosted on the Akamai CDN and is much, much faster. The actual content
>> is identical and can be validated via GPG signatures…
>>
>>
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Dmitry
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* spacewalk-list-bounces at redhat.com [mailto:spacewalk-list-bounces
>> @redhat.com] *On Behalf Of *prmarino1 at gmail.com
>> *Sent:* Thursday, August 25, 2016 6:54 PM
>> *To:* NZ Asparona Technical Support (NZ - Auckland);
>> spacewalk-list at redhat.com
>> *Subject:* Re: [Spacewalk-list] FW: What does ULN gives you that
>> standard oracle public yum doesn't
>>
>>
>>
>> This is not a spacewalk related subject but I will answer it any way.
>>
>> Indemification‎!
>>
>> In other words if your business has any SOX or ‎PCI requirements and you
>> use oracle linux you need to pay them for support for the required servers.
>>
>> ‎The reason is that unless you can reasonably prove that you employ
>>  developers for every package on all of the boxes that fall under those
>>  requirements then you must pay for support. To fully understand the
>> reasons for this you need to understand what a lot of purposely vague legal
>> phrases actually mean, but in short it means you need proof you pay some
>> one to ensure you're operating system is secure and if a new vulnerability
>> is doscovered at your company then you can get some one qualified to fix it
>> in a resonable amount of time.
>>
>>
>>
>> *From: *NZ Asparona Technical Support (NZ - Auckland)
>>
>> *Sent: *Wednesday, August 24, 2016 23:59
>>
>> *To: *spacewalk-list at redhat.com
>>
>> *Reply To: *spacewalk-list at redhat.com
>>
>> *Subject: *[Spacewalk-list] FW: What does ULN gives you that standard
>> oracle public yum doesn't
>>
>>
>>
>> Hi guys,
>>
>>
>>
>> The question I was trying to answer configuring spacewalk is:
>>
>>
>>
>> What does Oracle ULN gives you that standard oracle public yum doesn't?
>>
>>
>>
>> Except DTrace and ASMLib which are rarely used in general case scenario,
>> what are other ULN advantages before public yum?
>>
>>
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Dmitry
>>
>>
>>
>> CAUTION: This email message and attachments are confidential to Deloitte
>> and may be subject to legal privilege or copyright. If you have received
>> this email in error, please advise the sender immediately and destroy the
>> message and any attachments. If you are not the intended recipient you are
>> notified that any use, distribution, amendment, copying or any action taken
>> or omitted to be taken in reliance of this message or attachments is
>> strictly prohibited.  If you are an existing client, this email is provided
>> in accordance with the latest terms of engagement which we have agreed with
>> you.
>>
>> Email is inherently subject to delay or fault in transmission,
>> interception, alteration and computer viruses. While Deloitte does employ
>> anti-virus measures, no assurance or guarantee is implied or should be
>> construed that this email message or its attachments are free from computer
>> viruses. Deloitte assumes no responsibility for any such virus or any
>> effects of such a virus on the recipient's systems or data.
>>
>> Deloitte refers to the New Zealand member firm of Deloitte Touche
>> Tohmatsu Limited
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> CAUTION: This email message and attachments are confidential to Deloitte
>> and may be subject to legal privilege or copyright. If you have received
>> this email in error, please advise the sender immediately and destroy the
>> message and any attachments. If you are not the intended recipient you are
>> notified that any use, distribution, amendment, copying or any action taken
>> or omitted to be taken in reliance of this message or attachments is
>> strictly prohibited.  If you are an existing client, this email is provided
>> in accordance with the latest terms of engagement which we have agreed with
>> you.
>>
>> Email is inherently subject to delay or fault in transmission,
>> interception, alteration and computer viruses. While Deloitte does employ
>> anti-virus measures, no assurance or guarantee is implied or should be
>> construed that this email message or its attachments are free from computer
>> viruses. Deloitte assumes no responsibility for any such virus or any
>> effects of such a virus on the recipient's systems or data.
>>
>> Deloitte refers to the New Zealand member firm of Deloitte Touche
>> Tohmatsu Limited
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Spacewalk-list mailing list
>> Spacewalk-list at redhat.com
>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-list
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Spacewalk-list mailing list
> Spacewalk-list at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-list
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Spacewalk-list mailing list
> Spacewalk-list at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-list
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/spacewalk-list/attachments/20160827/d370a5b6/attachment.htm>


More information about the Spacewalk-list mailing list