[Spacewalk-list] Spacewalk as Virtual Host?

[Maxime VEROONE]

Hi,

 

Depending on your number of systems, Spacewalk is quite a resource intensive software. I would personally recommend against it. 

But if you’re not running virtualization avec have a low number of systems, that can be understandable to share the resources.

 

Strictly speaking of integration, modifying the apache2 configuration is possible, although it will probably break the update process of spacewalk, would you want to move to higher versions later, requiring you to do it manually. (which can’t be too difficult)

 

Regards,
Maxime Veroone

 

De : spacewalk-list-bounces at redhat.com [mailto:spacewalk-list-bounces at redhat.com] De la part de Lachlan Musicman
Envoyé : lundi 7 mars 2016 06:10
À : spacewalk-list at redhat.com
Objet : [Spacewalk-list] Spacewalk as Virtual Host?

 

Hi,

We have installed Spacewalk on a "utilities" server, and I would like to change Spacewalk to a virtualhost set up in Apache2 so we can serve a number of services through Apache2 (Icinga, etc).

The only advice I've found is an email from this list - but it's now 6 years old. 

https://www.redhat.com/archives/spacewalk-list/2010-February/msg00206.html

 

Do people still recommend against it?

cheers

L.




------
The most dangerous phrase in the language is, "We've always done it this way."

- Grace Hopper

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/spacewalk-list/attachments/20160307/95649d02/attachment.htm>