[Spacewalk-list] Which version of Spacewalk is the same as Redhat Satellite 6?

[Konstantin Raskoshnyi]

Ok, it's just your personal opinion, but I bet you didn't work with
software like chef and ansible.

Cheers
On Fri, Jan 27, 2017 at 8:45 AM Kobus Bensch <kobus at giffgaff.co.uk> wrote:

> Hi
>
> Beg to differ on the config management. It is great with it. You just need
> to know how. Does macros, templates the lot.
>
> Kobus Bensch
>
>
> On 27 Jan 2017, at 16:24, Konstantin Raskoshnyi <konrasko at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> With all respect to spacewalk - it's a great product, but not for config
> management. Maximum for static templates.
> But it's a good soft for package updates, ks and revision of your
> machines.
>
>
> On Fri, Jan 27, 2017 at 2:00 AM Kobus Bensch <kobus at giffgaff.co.uk> wrote:
>
> As far as spacewalk is concerned, you can have a FULL configuration
> management system with templates, variables and machine specific setup just
> like what puppet, cfengine, chef or sensible will give you. You just need
> to know how. I managed 460 servers in this way with spacewalk.
>
>
>
> > On 27 Jan 2017, at 02:04, Paul Robert Marino <prmarino1 at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > Just so you know its also the upstream project for SUSE Manager, and
> > Oracle supports it as well.
> > the new satellite 6 code base, and SAM are nice implementations of the
> > technologies mentioned above, but is philosophically not just
> > technologically different especially when it comes to configuration
> > management.
> >
> > Also after a certain version in the Satellite 5 series they started
> > including https://github.com/splice/spacewalk-splice-tool in RHN
> > satellite 5 to sync it with SAM (Subscription Asset Manager). SAM is
> > registration and package repo proxy for access.redhat.com based on the
> > satellite 6 code, its free with RHEL support but doesn't include
> > configuration management, or provisioning, and only supports
> > rudimentary package management on its own.
> >
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 7:36 PM, Daniel Swan <swan_daniel at hotmail.com>
> wrote:
> >> On a related note, does anyone have a list of which Spacewalk versions
> >> (Roughly) correlate to which (non-6)  Satellite versions?
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Spacewalk-list mailing list
> >> Spacewalk-list at redhat.com
> >> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-list
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Spacewalk-list mailing list
> > Spacewalk-list at redhat.com
> > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-list
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Spacewalk-list mailing list
> Spacewalk-list at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-list
>
> _______________________________________________
> Spacewalk-list mailing list
> Spacewalk-list at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-list
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Spacewalk-list mailing list
> Spacewalk-list at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-list
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/spacewalk-list/attachments/20170127/087bb2c2/attachment.htm>