[Spacewalk-list] strange behavior with SW 2.7 and Debian 8 Clients

Wed Aug 22 19:15:00 UTC 2018

I'm not familiar with github. A pull request is a request to pull and
change a file, is'nt it?
But I've created a new one, may I upload this?
It is here:
https://github.com/4thomasmueller/spacewalk-scripts/blob/master/get_debian_ubuntu_multiarch_pkg.py

T.

2018-08-21 20:40 GMT+02:00 Robert Paschedag <robert.paschedag at web.de>:

> Am 21. August 2018 16:11:39 MESZ schrieb "Thomas Müller" <
> 4thomasmueller at gmail.com>:
> >Robert, your perl script does not extract Packages.gz from Ubuntu
> >Repositories.
> >I'm doing this in an own python script, which uses the Packages.xz.
> >The run your add header script and all was fine.
> >
> >Thank you and the other guys for the hints.
> >
> >2018-08-11 15:50 GMT+02:00 Robert Paschedag <robert.paschedag at web.de>:
> >
> >> Am 8. August 2018 09:26:43 MESZ schrieb "Thomas Müller" <
> >> 4thomasmueller at gmail.com>:
> >> >Hello,
> >> >I use now the advised sync script and the add-header script for
> >Debian
> >> >systems, it works. In Packages I can see the different Multi-Arch:
> >> >headers.
> >> >Then I tried this for Ubuntu 16.04 as well, but the sync script
> >fails
> >> >with:
> >> >
> >> >INFO: Repo URL:
> >> >http://ftp.tu-chemnitz.de/pub/linux/ubuntu/dists/xenial-
> >> security/multiverse/binary-amd64/
> >> >INFO: Ubuntu root is http://ftp.tu-chemnitz.de/pub/linux/ubuntu/
> >> >INFO: Fetching Packages.gz... done
> >> >ERROR: Failed to uncompress Packages.gz
> >> >
> >> >Who knows how packages.gz from Ubuntu can be uncompressed?
> >> >or should I use the packages.xz file for ubuntu instead packages.gz?
> >> >
> >> >file Packages-debian8.gz:
> >> >gzip compressed data, max compression, from Unix
> >> >
> >> >file Packages-ubuntu16.gz
> >> >UTF-8 Unicode text, with very long lines
> >> >
> >> >Regards, Thomas
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >2018-08-04 17:19 GMT+02:00 Robert Paschedag
> ><robert.paschedag at web.de>:
> >> >
> >> >> Am 4. August 2018 17:02:50 MESZ schrieb "Thomas Müller" <
> >> >> 4thomasmueller at gmail.com>:
> >> >> >Ok, I saw it...
> >> >> >But if I use the advised spacewalk-debian-sync script (to add
> >header
> >> >> >later with the other script) instead of spacewalk-repo-sync have
> >all
> >> >> >channels to be synchronized „from scratch“?
> >> >> >The script says <numbers> of packages synced, <more> to sync.
> >> >>
> >> >> If you look at the code you'll see, that it's independent from
> >what
> >> >you
> >> >> have synced. It extracts the header from all packages within the
> >> >original
> >> >> packages. You can then use that file later to patch the packages
> >> >created by
> >> >> spacewalk.
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> Robert
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> >Von meinem iPad gesendet
> >> >> >
> >> >> >Thomas Müller
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> >> Am 03.08.2018 um 19:06 schrieb Robert Paschedag
> >> >> ><robert.paschedag at web.de>:
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> Am 3. August 2018 12:35:52 MESZ schrieb "Thomas Müller"
> >> >> ><4thomasmueller at gmail.com>:
> >> >> >>> Hello,
> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >>> I've got it fixed by a dirty way.
> >> >> >>> in /var/cache/rhn/repodata/<debian channel>
> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >>> mv Packages Packages.orig
> >> >> >>> mv Packages.gz Packages.gz.orig
> >> >> >>> cat Packages.orig | sed '/^\Package:/a Multi-Arch: allowed' >
> >> >> >Packages
> >> >> >>> cp Packages Packages.raw
> >> >> >>> gzip Packages
> >> >> >>> mv Packages.raw Packages
> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >>> Resigning via secureApt.sh, on clients apt-get update.
> >> >> >>> works on 3 testsystems :-)
> >> >> >>> Debian9 has right now no problem
> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >>> Many thanks.
> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >>> 2018-08-02 18:16 GMT+02:00 Robert Paschedag
> >> >> ><robert.paschedag at web.de>:
> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >>>> Am 2. August 2018 18:10:09 MESZ schrieb "Thomas Müller" <
> >> >> >>>> 4thomasmueller at gmail.com>:
> >> >> >>>>> An additional question: If I use the spacewalk-debian-sync
> >> >script
> >> >> >to
> >> >> >>>>> fix the multiarch header problem should I use as repo
> >> >binary-all
> >> >> >>>>> instead of binary-amd64 for main, contrib and non-free?
> >> >> >>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>
> >> >> >>>>> Von meinem iPad gesendet
> >> >> >>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>> Am 02.08.2018 um 17:20 schrieb Robert Paschedag
> >> >> >>>>> <robert.paschedag at web.de>:
> >> >> >>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>> Am 2. August 2018 12:30:24 MESZ schrieb "Thomas Müller"
> >> >> >>>>> <4thomasmueller at gmail.com>:
> >> >> >>>>>>> Hi @all,
> >> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>> we've set up a spacewalk server 2.7 and registered
> >debian8,
> >> >> >>> debian8
> >> >> >>>>> and
> >> >> >>>>>>> oracle linux systems to it.
> >> >> >>>>>>> The oracle and debian9 systems work like a charm with
> >> >spacewalk,
> >> >> >>> but
> >> >> >>>>>>> the
> >> >> >>>>>>> debian8 systems removes all rhn- and spacewalk tools after
> >> >> >>>>> installing a
> >> >> >>>>>>> package.
> >> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>> Some investigations shows any unresolved dependencies
> >> >> >>> (python:any)
> >> >> >>>>> (??)
> >> >> >>>>>>> But - if we change the /etc/apt/sources.list to let the
> >> >system
> >> >> >>> look
> >> >> >>>>> at
> >> >> >>>>>>> the
> >> >> >>>>>>> original debian repositories all works as expected.
> >> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>> sources.list spacewalk only:
> >> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>> # Debian 8 (Jessie)
> >> >> >>>>>>> #
> >> >> >>>>>>> # wird durch Spacewalk verwaltet
> >> >> >>>>>>> #
> >> >> >>>>>>> # deb http://ftp.de.debian.org/debian/ jessie main
> >> >> >>>>>>> # deb-src http://ftp.de.debian.org/debian/ jessie main
> >> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>> # deb http://security.debian.org/ jessie/updates main
> >contrib
> >> >> >>>>>>> # deb-src http://security.debian.org/ jessie/updates main
> >> >> >contrib
> >> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>> # jessie-updates, previously known as 'volatile'
> >> >> >>>>>>> # deb http://ftp.de.debian.org/debian/ jessie-updates main
> >> >> >>> contrib
> >> >> >>>>>>> # deb-src http://ftp.de.debian.org/debian/ jessie-updates
> >> >main
> >> >> >>>>> contrib
> >> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>> spacewalk.list:
> >> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>> deb [trusted=yes] spacewalk://it-srv-space01.nbintern.net
> >> >> >debian8
> >> >> >>>>>>> repodata
> >> >> >>>>>>> deb [trusted=yes] spacewalk://it-srv-space01.nbintern.net
> >> >> >>>>>>> debian8-main-security repodata
> >> >> >>>>>>> deb [trusted=yes] spacewalk://it-srv-space01.nbintern.net
> >> >> >>>>>>> debian8-main-update repodata
> >> >> >>>>>>> deb [trusted=yes] spacewalk://it-srv-space01.nbintern.net
> >> >> >>>>>>> debian8-contrib
> >> >> >>>>>>> repodata
> >> >> >>>>>>> deb [trusted=yes] spacewalk://it-srv-space01.nbintern.net
> >> >> >>>>>>> debian8-contrib-security repodata
> >> >> >>>>>>> deb [trusted=yes] spacewalk://it-srv-space01.nbintern.net
> >> >> >>>>>>> debian8-contrib-update repodata
> >> >> >>>>>>> deb [trusted=yes] spacewalk://it-srv-space01.nbintern.net
> >> >> >>>>>>> debian8-nonfree
> >> >> >>>>>>> repodata
> >> >> >>>>>>> deb [trusted=yes] spacewalk://it-srv-space01.nbintern.net
> >> >> >>>>>>> debian8-nonfree-security repodata
> >> >> >>>>>>> deb [trusted=yes] spacewalk://it-srv-space01.nbintern.net
> >> >> >>>>>>> debian8-nonfree-update repodata
> >> >> >>>>>>> deb [trusted=yes] spacewalk://it-srv-space01.nbintern.net
> >> >> >>>>> debian8-main
> >> >> >>>>>>> repodata
> >> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>> apt install atop:
> >> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>> Paketlisten werden gelesen... Fertig
> >> >> >>>>>>> Abhängigkeitsbaum wird aufgebaut.
> >> >> >>>>>>> Statusinformationen werden eingelesen.... Fertig
> >> >> >>>>>>> atop ist schon die neueste Version.
> >> >> >>>>>>> Probieren Sie »apt-get -f install«, um dies zu
> >korrigieren:
> >> >> >>>>>>> Die folgenden Pakete haben unerfüllte Abhängigkeiten:
> >> >> >>>>>>> apt-transport-spacewalk : Hängt ab von: python:any (>=
> >> >2.6.6-7~)
> >> >> >>> ist
> >> >> >>>>>>> aber
> >> >> >>>>>>> nicht installierbar
> >> >> >>>>>>> python-cffi : Hängt ab von: python:any (>= 2.7.5-5~) ist
> >aber
> >> >> >>> nicht
> >> >> >>>>>>> installierbar
> >> >> >>>>>>> python-cryptography : Hängt ab von: python:any (>=
> >2.7.5-5~)
> >> >ist
> >> >> >>>>> aber
> >> >> >>>>>>> nicht installierbar
> >> >> >>>>>>> python-openssl : Hängt ab von: python:any (>= 2.7.5-5~)
> >ist
> >> >aber
> >> >> >>>>> nicht
> >> >> >>>>>>> installierbar
> >> >> >>>>>>>                Hängt ab von: python:any (< 2.8) ist aber
> >> >nicht
> >> >> >>>>>>> installierbar
> >> >> >>>>>>> python-pkg-resources : Hängt ab von: python:any (>= 2.7)
> >ist
> >> >> >aber
> >> >> >>>>> nicht
> >> >> >>>>>>> installierbar
> >> >> >>>>>>>                      Hängt ab von: python:any (< 2.8) ist
> >> >aber
> >> >> >>>>> nicht
> >> >> >>>>>>> installierbar
> >> >> >>>>>>> python-pycparser : Hängt ab von: python:any (>= 2.7.5-5~)
> >ist
> >> >> >>> aber
> >> >> >>>>>>> nicht
> >> >> >>>>>>> installierbar
> >> >> >>>>>>>                  Hängt ab von: python:any (< 2.8) ist aber
> >> >nicht
> >> >> >>>>>>> installierbar
> >> >> >>>>>>> python-six : Hängt ab von: python:any (>= 2.7.5-5~) ist
> >aber
> >> >> >>> nicht
> >> >> >>>>>>> installierbar
> >> >> >>>>>>>        Hängt ab von: python:any (< 2.8) ist aber nicht
> >> >> >>>>> installierbar
> >> >> >>>>>>> rhn-client-tools : Hängt ab von: python:any ist aber nicht
> >> >> >>>>>>> installierbar
> >> >> >>>>>>>                Empfiehlt: apt-spacewalk ist aber nicht
> >> >> >>>>> installierbar
> >> >> >>>>>>> E: Unerfüllte Abhängigkeiten. Versuchen Sie »apt-get -f
> >> >install«
> >> >> >>>>> ohne
> >> >> >>>>>>> Angabe eines Pakets (oder geben Sie eine Lösung an).
> >> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>> apt install -f:
> >> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>> Paketlisten werden gelesen... Fertig
> >> >> >>>>>>> Abhängigkeitsbaum wird aufgebaut.
> >> >> >>>>>>> Statusinformationen werden eingelesen.... Fertig
> >> >> >>>>>>> Abhängigkeiten werden korrigiert ... Fertig
> >> >> >>>>>>> Das folgende Paket wurde automatisch installiert und wird
> >> >nicht
> >> >> >>> mehr
> >> >> >>>>>>> benötigt:
> >> >> >>>>>>> python-ply
> >> >> >>>>>>> Verwenden Sie »apt-get autoremove«, um es zu entfernen.
> >> >> >>>>>>> Die folgenden Pakete werden ENTFERNT:
> >> >> >>>>>>> apt-transport-spacewalk python-cffi python-cryptography
> >> >> >>>>> python-openssl
> >> >> >>>>>>> python-pkg-resources python-pycparser python-rhn
> >python-six
> >> >> >>>>>>> rhn-client-tools rhncfg rhnsd
> >> >> >>>>>>> 0 aktualisiert, 0 neu installiert, 11 zu entfernen und 1
> >> >nicht
> >> >> >>>>>>> aktualisiert.
> >> >> >>>>>>> Nach dieser Operation werden 6.971 kB Plattenplatz
> >> >freigegeben.
> >> >> >>>>>>> Möchten Sie fortfahren? [J/n]
> >> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>> As stated, if the souces.list is
> >> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>> # Debian 8 (Jessie)
> >> >> >>>>>>> #
> >> >> >>>>>>> # wird durch Spacewalk verwaltet
> >> >> >>>>>>> #
> >> >> >>>>>>> deb http://ftp.de.debian.org/debian/ jessie main
> >> >> >>>>>>> # deb-src http://ftp.de.debian.org/debian/ jessie main
> >> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>> deb http://security.debian.org/ jessie/updates main
> >contrib
> >> >> >>>>>>> # deb-src http://security.debian.org/ jessie/updates main
> >> >> >contrib
> >> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>> # jessie-updates, previously known as 'volatile'
> >> >> >>>>>>> deb http://ftp.de.debian.org/debian/ jessie-updates main
> >> >contrib
> >> >> >>>>>>> # deb-src http://ftp.de.debian.org/debian/ jessie-updates
> >> >main
> >> >> >>>>> contrib
> >> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>> no issue....
> >> >> >>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>> This is because of the missing MultiArch header within the
> >> >> >>>>> packages.gz files created by spacewalk.
> >> >> >>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>> Strange enough that your Debian 9 systems are running. They
> >> >> >should
> >> >> >>>>> have the same problem.
> >> >> >>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>> Robert
> >> >> >>>>>> --
> >> >> >>>>>> sent from my mobile device
> >> >> >>>>
> >> >> >>>> Just leave it as it is right now. That should fit.
> >> >> >>>>
> >> >> >>>> This is all just a workaround. The main problem currently is,
> >> >that
> >> >> >>> there
> >> >> >>>> is no field (or tables) within the DB scheme to store this
> >> >header
> >> >> >>> within
> >> >> >>>> the DB, so this can be put into the packages.gz file while it
> >> >gets
> >> >> >>> created.
> >> >> >>>>
> >> >> >>>> Robert
> >> >> >>>> --
> >> >> >>>> sent from my mobile device
> >> >> >>>>
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> This will not work.
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> It's because "allowed" is not the only possible value for a
> >> >package.
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> You might want to try a
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> grep ^Multi packages.gz | sort | uniq -c
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> to get an idea.
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> robert.paschedag at netlution.de
> >> >> >> --
> >> >> >> sent from my mobile device
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> --
> >> >> sent from my mobile device
> >> >>
> >>
> >> Well...I think the script should be able to uncompress the Ubuntu
> >packages
> >> files... At least...I remember it was also tested with Ubuntu.
> >>
> >> Robert
> >> --
> >> sent from my mobile device
> >>
>
> Feel free to create a pull request at https://github.com/philicious/
> spacewalk-scripts
>
> So everybody will gain from this.
>
> Robert
> --
> sent from my mobile device
>

-- 
Mit freundlichen Grüßen
Thomas Müller
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/spacewalk-list/attachments/20180822/5b051947/attachment.htm>