[Spacewalk-list] [Spacewalk-devel] Some 2.8.x version RPMs list in 2.9 COPR project

Michael Mraka michael.mraka at redhat.com
Tue Apr 30 08:55:31 UTC 2019


Laurence Rochfort:
> > Hello Laurence,
> >
> > these versions are ok. There has been no change during Spacewalk 2.9
> > development in these packages. If you look into .spec you can see
> > Version: 2.9.0 here but it is just a result of an automatic version
> > bump so the first real change in the package would increased version to
> > 2.9.1.
> >
> > Let's check latest tagged versions:
> > $ cd spacewalk.git
> > $ git checksout SPACEWALK-2.9
> > $ for t in spacewalk-proxy-installer spacewalk-config spacewalk-setup-postgresql spacewalk-proxy-selinux perl-Satcon spacewalk-2 spacewalk-proxy-docs spacewalk-proxy-html ; do git tag | grep $t | tail -1 ; done
> > spacewalk-proxy-installer-2.8.6-1
> > spacewalk-config-2.8.5-1
> > spacewalk-setup-postgresql-2.8.4-1
> > spacewalk-proxy-selinux-2.8.3-1
> > perl-Satcon-2.8.2-1
> > spacewalk-2.8.2-1
> > spacewalk-proxy-docs-2.8.2-1
> > spacewalk-proxy-html-2.8.2-1
> 
> Thanks for the explanation, Michael.
> 
> I do wonder if having the main Spacewalk 2.9 package have a version of
> 2.8 is a little confusing for a sys admin who's not so familiar with
> Spacewalk?
> 
> If I were to ask yum which version of Spacewalk I have installed and it
> says 2.8, or the main package version didn't match all the others, then
> it might be confusing and cause me to try to upgrade?

Hello Laurence,

Well, that's actually a good point. I've rebuilt spacewalk package both
in 2.9 branch and master to reflect the repository version.> 

> Just a thought.
> 
> --
> Cheers,
> Laurence.

Regards,

--
Michael Mráka
System Management Engineering, Red Hat




More information about the Spacewalk-list mailing list