[Tendrl-devel] linking to storage docs from Tendrl user interface

[Matt Carrano]

Hi Ken,

I'd like to participate in any discussion of this.  Agree that in theory it
is a good idea, but there are potential issues as you reference.

Matt

On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 12:33 PM, Kenneth Hartsoe <khartsoe at redhat.com>
wrote:

> Hi Martin,
>
> I agree; however, I would like to discuss further to identify any
> potential issues related to product versioning, link stability, etc. I'll
> set up a meeting to explore. If anyone else wants to join, please let me
> know, thanks.
>
> Ken Hartsoe
> Content Strategist
> Red Hat Storage Documentation
>
> khartsoe at redhat.com; IRC: khartsoe
> Office: 919 754 4770; Internal: 814 4770
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> | Dear all,
> |
> | would it make sense to link to GlusterFS/Ceph documentation from
> | the Tendrl web interface for each storage specific operation? So for
> | example in a screen which provides configuration related to start of
> | glusterfs rebalance operation, we would provide a link to glusterfs
> | documentation on rebalance.
> |
> | This would make clear what each operation means exactly, it would fit
> | nicely to our plan to use storage specific terminology and last but
> | not least it would simplify the issues related to integration of 2 very
> | different storage systems into single management interface, when a
> | common term is used.
> |
> | What do you think? I believe that such pointers would provide
> | a significant value for the user.
> |
> | --
> | Martin Bukatovic
> | USM QE team
> |
> | _______________________________________________
> | Tendrl-devel mailing list
> | Tendrl-devel at redhat.com
> | https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/tendrl-devel
> |
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tendrl-devel mailing list
> Tendrl-devel at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/tendrl-devel
>



-- 
Matt Carrano
Sr. Interaction Designer
Red Hat, Inc.
mcarrano at redhat.com