[Tendrl-devel] Provisioning Integration for Ceph and Gluster

[Alfredo Deza]

On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 8:26 AM, Jeff Applewhite <japplewh at redhat.com> wrote:
> There is currently a fork of the calamari api supporting the Tendrl project
> and the need is to have the Calamari APIs support the same features in this
> fork (or at least what has been requested).

I thought the discussion was about the ceph-installer, not Calamari.
We weren't aware there was
anything related with Calamari APIs other than deployment (which is
currently supported)

> This is a serious concern given
> our agreed mutual path forward. We need to re-prioritize or define a new
> path forward.

For the ceph-installer we proposed the one BZ (#1309415) that we felt
comfortable delivering by
early December. Since it has been dropped, we can't commit to any of
the other BZs for this year as they would
require significant changes in how the ceph-installer operates.


>
> On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 7:56 AM, Alfredo Deza <adeza at redhat.com> wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 8:10 AM, Mrugesh Karnik <mrugesh at brainfunked.org>
>> wrote:
>> > On 14 November 2016 at 20:47, Alfredo Deza <adeza at redhat.com> wrote:
>> >> On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 7:39 AM, Mrugesh Karnik <mrugesh at brainfunked.org
>> >
>> > wrote:
>> >> > On 5 November 2016 at 01:51, Alfredo Deza <adeza at redhat.com> wrote:
>> >> >> We estimate that delivering all of the BZs isn't going to be possible
>> >> >> by the end of November. Description on effort per BZ inline.
>> >> >
>> >> > Where would you put the estimate at, if not November end?
>> >>
>> >> To complete all BZs we are looking at roughly 1.5 months of Andrew and
>> >> I working on them.
>> >>
>> >> At this point we don't think we can provide undivided attention to
>> >> complete that effort. Since we are already two weeks into November
>> >> we are already looking at early to mid December to complete this BZ:
>> >>
>> >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1309415
>> >
>> > The callbacks functionality isn't going to be required by Tendrl, polling
>> > is sufficient.
>>
>> We went with the list of requirements for Tendrl and the callback was
>> included.
>>
>> > Would it be possible for you to focus on the other issues,
>> > instead, and provide us with a more concrete timeframe for by when work
>> on
>> > them could be completed?
>> >
>>
>> It will not be possible to focus on the other items as they require
>> significant effort. That is why we were able to commit
>> only to callbacks earlier this month.
>>
>> The estimated level of effort is about 1.5 months for both me and
>> Andrew to get the rest of BZs working. At this time we are unable to
>> accommodate that amount of work.
>>
>> > Thanks,
>> > Mrugesh
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Tendrl-devel mailing list
>> > Tendrl-devel at redhat.com
>> > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/tendrl-devel
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Tendrl-devel mailing list
>> Tendrl-devel at redhat.com
>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/tendrl-devel
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Jeff Applewhite
> Principal Product Manager
> _______________________________________________
> Tendrl-devel mailing list
> Tendrl-devel at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/tendrl-devel