installing tux

[Kursad Keskinege]

not tested recently, it was there, but as I said, it had grot reliability
issue. even worser, if tux crashes system crashes, no way out without a hard
reset.
Sam, is your server optimized for images?
Thank you.

On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 12:07 PM, Sam Watkins <swatkins at fastmail.fm> wrote:

> On Wed, 01 Apr 2009 11:04 +0300, "Kursad Keskinege"
> <keskinege at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hi Sam, personally, I would suggest nginx for litespeed replacement,
> > www.nginx.net, it's quite well under heavy load, incredible session
> > numbers it can support, also built in http load balancing. (what a
> > pity that it cannot support https load balancing natively)
> > K.
> > ps. i am not against tux. i loved the idea, but it's not stable
>
> Thanks,
>
> I'm aware of nginx and I have been benchmarking nginx 7, litespeed,
> cherokee, apache2 and the web server I am writing which I am calling
> tachyon.
>
> I am writing my own web server with specific features not found on other
> web servers, so I'm not interested in actually using another web server,
> I only want to benchmark them.
>
> My webserver outperforms all of the other web servers I have
> benchmarked.
>
> I also want to test it against tux, that's why I want to know the best
> way to install tux. Is tux still included in fedora distributions?
>
> thanks,
>
> Sam
>
> _______________________________________________
> tux-list mailing list
> tux-list at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/tux-list
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/tux-list/attachments/20090401/a228a698/attachment.htm>