[vfio-users] Help Patching Qemu for Vendor

[thibaut noah]

>
>
> On Sun, 8 May 2016 16:35:39 -0500
>>> Spam House <kthxplzdie at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> > Thibaut,
>>> >
>>> > Thanks for the info. The performance difference I am measuring with
>>> 3dmark
>>> > firestrike.
>>> >
>>> > Unraid Win10 VM (QEMU/KVM):
>>> > Overall Score = 14037
>>> > Graphics = 17152
>>> >
>>> > Arch Win10 VM (QEMU/KVM)
>>> > Overall Score  = 12085
>>> > Graphics = 13658
>>> >
>>>
>>> Should have been more explicit, what i meant was if you want updated
qemu for new features use qemu, if you want to use libvirt for the same
thing i believe you don't have to bother yourself with the qemu update ?
(need some confirmation here) but you would need an up to date libvirt.

2016-05-09 1:24 GMT+02:00 Okky Hendriansyah <okky.htf at gmail.com>:

> Hi Spam,
>

> I am using similar GPU as yours (MSI GTX 980 Ti Gaming 6G, with slightly
> overclock +100MHz GPU clock and +100MHz VRAM clock) and I also use Arch
> Linux as the hypervisor and I have scored 19332 in Fire Strike Graphics [1].
>

You call that slightly overclock? at +70mhz gpu clock i have artefacts lol.
How do you get 3dmark to take in account your overclocking? seems mine does
not detect changes : http://www.3dmark.com/fs/8403135
I see below that you didn't do anything specific in your qemu script, could
it been that libvirt masks some information about hardware?

_______________________________________________
> vfio-users mailing list
> vfio-users at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/vfio-users
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/vfio-users/attachments/20160509/3891b9d2/attachment.htm>