[virt-tools-list] [PATCH libosinfo] Handle distinction of OS vs kernel version correctly.
Daniel P. Berrange
berrange at redhat.com
Fri Apr 27 19:25:46 UTC 2012
On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 09:47:30AM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 09:27:35AM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> > No, I don't believe that is correct. This is conflating the Windows
> > kernel version (6.1) with the windows OS version (7). I in fact *do*
> > consider the Windows 2008 OS version to be 2008, but it has a kernel
> > version of 6.1. It is not OS version 6.1. Some Windows releases don't
> > have any sane version at all (Vista, ME, etc) in which case I'm just
> > leaving the data blank, but there is still a kernel version number
> > available for them.
> I would have thought that if "Windows 7" was really version 7, there
> would have been 6 preceding versions called Windows 1 through 6. In
> fact there were more like a dozen preceding versions according to
> Wikipedia. Anyhow, everyone refers to the version in the registry,
> which for "Windows 7" is 6.1.
After researching some more I found this page
Since Microsoft themselves officially say these are the real version
numbers, I'm withdrawing this patch.
|: http://berrange.com -o- http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :|
|: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org :|
|: http://autobuild.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :|
|: http://entangle-photo.org -o- http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :|
More information about the virt-tools-list