[virt-tools-list] [PATCH virt-viewer] display: Do not override size-allocate handler

Pavel Grunt pgrunt at redhat.com
Wed Aug 10 12:48:33 UTC 2016


On Wed, 2016-08-10 at 09:35 -0300, Eduardo Lima (Etrunko) wrote:
> On 08/10/2016 07:41 AM, Pavel Grunt wrote:
> > 
> > On Tue, 2016-08-09 at 17:44 +0200, Christophe Fergeau wrote:
> > > 
> > > On Tue, Aug 09, 2016 at 05:17:31PM +0200, Pavel Grunt wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > Just connect to the signal
> > > 
> > > I'm tempted to ask "why?". I think it's recommended (more efficient) to
> > > just override the vfunc directly when you can (ie when you derive a new
> > > widget) rather than connecting to a signal.
> > 
> > no strong reason, just a personal preference coming from the fact that
> > virt-viewer-display is not "adjusting" its allocation, rather it is only
> > using
> > it for setting the allocation for its child.
> > 
> 
> Well, in this case I think it would make sense. Did you get any
> collateral effects with this patch?
> 
I tested it (fedora & win client) and didn't notice anything wrong. I did not
see a reason for calling 'gtk_widget_set_allocation' if gtk can do it.

Pavel




More information about the virt-tools-list mailing list