[Virtio-fs] [PATCH] Virtiofs: fix null pointer deference in directIO

Liu Bo bo.liu at linux.alibaba.com
Tue Jul 30 22:29:39 UTC 2019


On Tue, Jul 30, 2019 at 11:30:41AM -0400, Vivek Goyal wrote:
> Hi Liu Bo,
> 
> I have committed your patch for now here.
> 
> https://github.com/rhvgoyal/linux/commits/virtio-fs-dev-5.1
> 
> I also added a patch to wait for page reference count to drop to 1 before
> range is reclaimed. It slows down mmap() workload very significantly
> though.
>

Yes, the impact on mmap is expected because of the 'unmap' in layout checking,
it'd be helpful to check layout on the dmap range instead of the whole inode.

However, there is a race bug in the current code between mmap workloads and dmap
reclaim, since the reclaim does not unmap the dmap range at all, such that the
dmap range might still stay in some process's page table, if such a dmap is
reclaimed, the situation would be worse.  So with unmapping the whole inode in
layout checking, at least it is correct in term of that race.

> Right now dmap reference patches are not there. This branch is still WIP
> and once I have done more testing and possible dax optimization, I will
> look into re-applying dmap reference changes on top of it and see if
> it can be done reasonably without breaking other things.
> 
> Will be good if you give this branch a try.

Sure, I've already made similar changes internally.

thanks,
-liubo

> 
> Thanks
> Vivek
> 
> On Fri, Jul 12, 2019 at 06:35:42AM +0800, Liu Bo wrote:
> > Virtiofs has used memremap to create page structs for its managed memory
> > and set pagemap's type to MEMORY_DEVICE_FS_DAX.  Thus, the page from
> > virtiofs's managed memory is a ZONE_DEVICE page, if %devmap_managed_key
> > was enabled by pmem drivers, put_page() will run into
> > __put_devmap_managed_page().  However, as page_free ops is not defined, it
> > ends up with a NULL pointer dereference.
> > 
> > As virtiofs presents its managed memory range as a dax device, this patch
> > makes virtiofs mimic how nvdimm/pmem.c setups pagemap fsdax.
> > 
> > =================
> > 
> > [ 1223.732964] BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 0000000000000000
> > [ 1223.733043] PGD 800000026bd91067 P4D 800000026bd91067 PUD 27631e067 PMD 0
> > [ 1223.733085] Oops: 0010 [#1] SMP PTI
> > [ 1223.733114] CPU: 1 PID: 16505 Comm: build Not tainted 4.19.48-dff9509 #1
> > [ 1223.733157] RIP: 0010:          (null)
> > [ 1223.733179] Code: Bad RIP value.
> > ..
> > [ 1223.733671] Call Trace:
> > [ 1223.733704]  fuse_release_user_pages+0xad/0xb0
> > [ 1223.733751]  fuse_direct_io+0x3ec/0x6a0
> > [ 1223.733823]  fuse_dax_direct_write+0x3c/0x70
> > [ 1223.733863]  fuse_file_write_iter+0x2ea/0x4c0
> > [ 1223.733978]  __vfs_write+0xde/0x160
> > [ 1223.734009]  vfs_write+0xab/0x190
> > [ 1223.734061]  ksys_write+0x45/0xc0
> > [ 1223.734094]  do_syscall_64+0x6b/0x330
> > [ 1223.734214]  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9
> > [ 1223.734261] RIP: 0033:0x15536bcddfd0
> > 
> > The reproducer could be as simply as,
> > 
> > addr = mmap(..., fileA, ...);
> > fdB = open(fileB, O_DIRECT);
> > write(fdB, addr);
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Liu Bo <bo.liu at linux.alibaba.com>
> > ---
> >  fs/fuse/virtio_fs.c | 26 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> >  1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/fs/fuse/virtio_fs.c b/fs/fuse/virtio_fs.c
> > index 05ea28c..9b3f2e9 100644
> > --- a/fs/fuse/virtio_fs.c
> > +++ b/fs/fuse/virtio_fs.c
> > @@ -538,6 +538,28 @@ static void virtio_fs_cleanup_dax(void *data)
> >  	put_dax(fs->dax_dev);
> >  }
> >  
> > +static void virtio_fs_release_pgmap_ops(void *_pgmap)
> > +{
> > +	dev_pagemap_put_ops();
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void virtio_fs_fsdax_pagefree(struct page *page, void *data)
> > +{
> > +	wake_up_var(&page->_refcount);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int virtio_fs_setup_pagemap_fsdax(struct device *dev,
> > +					 struct dev_pagemap *pgmap)
> > +{
> > +	dev_pagemap_get_ops();
> > +	if (devm_add_action_or_reset(dev, virtio_fs_release_pgmap_ops, pgmap))
> > +		return -ENOMEM;
> > +	pgmap->type = MEMORY_DEVICE_FS_DAX;
> > +	pgmap->page_free = virtio_fs_fsdax_pagefree;
> > +
> > +	return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> >  static int virtio_fs_setup_dax(struct virtio_device *vdev, struct virtio_fs *fs)
> >  {
> >  	struct virtio_shm_region cache_reg, journal_reg, vertab_reg;
> > @@ -600,7 +622,9 @@ static int virtio_fs_setup_dax(struct virtio_device *vdev, struct virtio_fs *fs)
> >  	pgmap->altmap_valid = false;
> >  	pgmap->ref = &mi->ref;
> >  	pgmap->kill = virtio_fs_percpu_kill;
> > -	pgmap->type = MEMORY_DEVICE_FS_DAX;
> > +
> > +	if (virtio_fs_setup_pagemap_fsdax(&vdev->dev, pgmap))
> > +		return -ENOMEM;
> >  
> >  	/* Ideally we would directly use the PCI BAR resource but
> >  	 * devm_memremap_pages() wants its own copy in pgmap.  So
> > -- 
> > 1.8.3.1
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > Virtio-fs mailing list
> > Virtio-fs at redhat.com
> > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/virtio-fs




More information about the Virtio-fs mailing list