[Virtio-fs] [PATCH 1/5] virtiofsd: take lo->mutex around lo_add_fd_mapping()

[Dr. David Alan Gilbert]

* Stefan Hajnoczi (stefanha at redhat.com) wrote:
> The lo_add_fd_mapping() function assumes lo->mutex is held, so we should
> acquire it.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha at redhat.com>

Thanks, applied

Would it make sense for me to squash this into:
    virtiofsd: passthrough_ll: add fd_map to hide file descriptors 

?

Dave

> ---
>  contrib/virtiofsd/passthrough_ll.c | 4 ++++
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/contrib/virtiofsd/passthrough_ll.c b/contrib/virtiofsd/passthrough_ll.c
> index 65b7352c95..417a104218 100644
> --- a/contrib/virtiofsd/passthrough_ll.c
> +++ b/contrib/virtiofsd/passthrough_ll.c
> @@ -1555,7 +1555,9 @@ static void lo_create(fuse_req_t req, fuse_ino_t parent, const char *name,
>  
>  		update_version(lo, lo_inode(req, parent));
>  
> +		pthread_mutex_lock(&lo->mutex);
>  		fh = lo_add_fd_mapping(req, fd);
> +		pthread_mutex_unlock(&lo->mutex);
>  		if (fh == -1) {
>  			close(fd);
>  			fuse_reply_err(req, ENOMEM);
> @@ -1760,7 +1762,9 @@ static void lo_open(fuse_req_t req, fuse_ino_t ino, struct fuse_file_info *fi)
>  	if (fd == -1)
>  		return (void) fuse_reply_err(req, errno);
>  
> +	pthread_mutex_lock(&lo->mutex);
>  	fh = lo_add_fd_mapping(req, fd);
> +	pthread_mutex_unlock(&lo->mutex);
>  	if (fh == -1) {
>  		close(fd);
>  		fuse_reply_err(req, ENOMEM);
> -- 
> 2.21.0
> 
--
Dr. David Alan Gilbert / dgilbert at redhat.com / Manchester, UK