[Virtio-fs] [RFC] [PATCH] virtiofsd: Auto switch between inline and thread-pool processing

Vivek Goyal vgoyal at redhat.com
Fri Apr 23 21:11:30 UTC 2021


This is just an RFC patch for now. I am still running performance numbers
and see if this method of switching is good enough or not. I did one run
and seemed to get higher performance on deeper queue depths. There were
few tests where I did not match lower queue depth performance with 
no thread pool. May be run to run variation.

For low queue depth workloads, inline processing works well. But for 
high queue depth (and multiple process/thread) workloads, parallel
processing of thread pool can benefit.

This patch is an experiment which tries to switch to between inline and
thread-pool processing. If number of requests received on queue is
1, inline processing is done. Otherwise requests are handed over to
a thread pool for processing.

Signed-off-by: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal at redhat.com>
---
 tools/virtiofsd/fuse_virtio.c |   27 +++++++++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

Index: rhvgoyal-qemu/tools/virtiofsd/fuse_virtio.c
===================================================================
--- rhvgoyal-qemu.orig/tools/virtiofsd/fuse_virtio.c	2021-04-23 10:03:46.175920039 -0400
+++ rhvgoyal-qemu/tools/virtiofsd/fuse_virtio.c	2021-04-23 10:56:37.793722634 -0400
@@ -446,6 +446,15 @@ err:
 static __thread bool clone_fs_called;
 
 /* Process one FVRequest in a thread pool */
+static void fv_queue_push_to_pool(gpointer data, gpointer user_data)
+{
+    FVRequest *req = data;
+    GThreadPool *pool = user_data;
+
+    g_thread_pool_push(pool, req, NULL);
+}
+
+/* Process one FVRequest in a thread pool */
 static void fv_queue_worker(gpointer data, gpointer user_data)
 {
     struct fv_QueueInfo *qi = user_data;
@@ -605,6 +614,7 @@ static void *fv_queue_thread(void *opaqu
     struct fuse_session *se = qi->virtio_dev->se;
     GThreadPool *pool = NULL;
     GList *req_list = NULL;
+    int nr_req = 0;
 
     if (se->thread_pool_size) {
         fuse_log(FUSE_LOG_DEBUG, "%s: Creating thread pool for Queue %d\n",
@@ -686,22 +696,23 @@ static void *fv_queue_thread(void *opaqu
             }
 
             req->reply_sent = false;
-
-            if (!se->thread_pool_size) {
-                req_list = g_list_prepend(req_list, req);
-            } else {
-                g_thread_pool_push(pool, req, NULL);
-            }
+            req_list = g_list_prepend(req_list, req);
+            nr_req++;
         }
 
         pthread_mutex_unlock(&qi->vq_lock);
         vu_dispatch_unlock(qi->virtio_dev);
 
         /* Process all the requests. */
-        if (!se->thread_pool_size && req_list != NULL) {
-            g_list_foreach(req_list, fv_queue_worker, qi);
+        if (req_list != NULL) {
+            if (!se->thread_pool_size || nr_req <= 2) {
+                g_list_foreach(req_list, fv_queue_worker, qi);
+            } else  {
+                g_list_foreach(req_list, fv_queue_push_to_pool, pool);
+            }
             g_list_free(req_list);
             req_list = NULL;
+            nr_req = 0;
         }
     }
 




More information about the Virtio-fs mailing list