[Virtio-fs] [PATCH v5 1/3] virtiofsd: Add support for FUSE_SYNCFS request with announce_submounts
German Maglione
gmaglione at redhat.com
Mon Feb 14 15:43:15 UTC 2022
On Mon, Feb 14, 2022 at 3:00 PM Greg Kurz <groug at kaod.org> wrote:
> Honor the expected behavior of syncfs() to synchronously flush all data
> and metadata to disk on linux systems.
>
> If virtiofsd is started with '-o announce_submounts', the client is
> expected to send a FUSE_SYNCFS request for each individual submount.
> In this case, we just create a new file descriptor on the submount
> inode with lo_inode_open(), call syncfs() on it and close it. The
> intermediary file is needed because O_PATH descriptors aren't
> backed by an actual file and syncfs() would fail with EBADF.
>
> If virtiofsd is started without '-o announce_submounts' or if the
> client doesn't have the FUSE_CAP_SUBMOUNTS capability, the client
> only sends a single FUSE_SYNCFS request for the root inode. The
> server would thus need to track submounts internally and call
> syncfs() on each of them. This will be implemented later.
>
> Note that syncfs() might suffer from a time penalty if the submounts
> are being hammered by some unrelated workload on the host. The only
> solution to prevent that is to avoid shared mounts.
>
> Signed-off-by: Greg Kurz <groug at kaod.org>
> ---
> tools/virtiofsd/fuse_lowlevel.c | 11 +++++++
> tools/virtiofsd/fuse_lowlevel.h | 13 ++++++++
> tools/virtiofsd/passthrough_ll.c | 45 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> tools/virtiofsd/passthrough_seccomp.c | 1 +
> 4 files changed, 70 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/tools/virtiofsd/fuse_lowlevel.c
> b/tools/virtiofsd/fuse_lowlevel.c
> index e4679c73abc2..e02d8b25a5f6 100644
> --- a/tools/virtiofsd/fuse_lowlevel.c
> +++ b/tools/virtiofsd/fuse_lowlevel.c
> @@ -1876,6 +1876,16 @@ static void do_lseek(fuse_req_t req, fuse_ino_t
> nodeid,
> }
> }
>
> +static void do_syncfs(fuse_req_t req, fuse_ino_t nodeid,
> + struct fuse_mbuf_iter *iter)
> +{
> + if (req->se->op.syncfs) {
> + req->se->op.syncfs(req, nodeid);
> + } else {
> + fuse_reply_err(req, ENOSYS);
> + }
> +}
> +
> static void do_init(fuse_req_t req, fuse_ino_t nodeid,
> struct fuse_mbuf_iter *iter)
> {
> @@ -2280,6 +2290,7 @@ static struct {
> [FUSE_RENAME2] = { do_rename2, "RENAME2" },
> [FUSE_COPY_FILE_RANGE] = { do_copy_file_range, "COPY_FILE_RANGE" },
> [FUSE_LSEEK] = { do_lseek, "LSEEK" },
> + [FUSE_SYNCFS] = { do_syncfs, "SYNCFS" },
> };
>
> #define FUSE_MAXOP (sizeof(fuse_ll_ops) / sizeof(fuse_ll_ops[0]))
> diff --git a/tools/virtiofsd/fuse_lowlevel.h
> b/tools/virtiofsd/fuse_lowlevel.h
> index c55c0ca2fc1c..b889dae4de0e 100644
> --- a/tools/virtiofsd/fuse_lowlevel.h
> +++ b/tools/virtiofsd/fuse_lowlevel.h
> @@ -1226,6 +1226,19 @@ struct fuse_lowlevel_ops {
> */
> void (*lseek)(fuse_req_t req, fuse_ino_t ino, off_t off, int whence,
> struct fuse_file_info *fi);
> +
> + /**
> + * Synchronize file system content
> + *
> + * If this request is answered with an error code of ENOSYS,
> + * this is treated as success and future calls to syncfs() will
> + * succeed automatically without being sent to the filesystem
> + * process.
> + *
> + * @param req request handle
> + * @param ino the inode number
> + */
> + void (*syncfs)(fuse_req_t req, fuse_ino_t ino);
> };
>
> /**
> diff --git a/tools/virtiofsd/passthrough_ll.c
> b/tools/virtiofsd/passthrough_ll.c
> index b3d0674f6d2f..2bf5d40df531 100644
> --- a/tools/virtiofsd/passthrough_ll.c
> +++ b/tools/virtiofsd/passthrough_ll.c
> @@ -3357,6 +3357,50 @@ static void lo_lseek(fuse_req_t req, fuse_ino_t
> ino, off_t off, int whence,
> }
> }
>
> +static int lo_do_syncfs(struct lo_data *lo, struct lo_inode *inode)
> +{
> + int fd, ret = 0;
> +
> + fuse_log(FUSE_LOG_DEBUG, "lo_do_syncfs(ino=%" PRIu64 ")\n",
> + inode->fuse_ino);
> +
> + fd = lo_inode_open(lo, inode, O_RDONLY);
> + if (fd < 0) {
> + return -fd;
> + }
> +
> + if (syncfs(fd) < 0) {
> + ret = errno;
> + }
> +
> + close(fd);
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static void lo_syncfs(fuse_req_t req, fuse_ino_t ino)
> +{
> + struct lo_data *lo = lo_data(req);
> + int err;
> +
> + if (lo->announce_submounts) {
> + struct lo_inode *inode;
> +
> + inode = lo_inode(req, ino);
> + if (!inode) {
> + fuse_reply_err(req, EBADF);
> + return;
> + }
> +
> + err = lo_do_syncfs(lo, inode);
> + lo_inode_put(lo, &inode);
> + } else {
> + /* Requires the sever to track submounts. Not implemented yet */
> + err = ENOSYS;
> + }
>
In the current rust version we don't check if announce_submount is enabled,
with and without it lo_syncfs do the same thing. So, if announce_submount
is not enabled, at least the root shared dir get synced.
> +
> + fuse_reply_err(req, err);
> +}
> +
> static void lo_destroy(void *userdata)
> {
> struct lo_data *lo = (struct lo_data *)userdata;
> @@ -3417,6 +3461,7 @@ static struct fuse_lowlevel_ops lo_oper = {
> .copy_file_range = lo_copy_file_range,
> #endif
> .lseek = lo_lseek,
> + .syncfs = lo_syncfs,
> .destroy = lo_destroy,
> };
>
> diff --git a/tools/virtiofsd/passthrough_seccomp.c
> b/tools/virtiofsd/passthrough_seccomp.c
> index a3ce9f898d2d..3e9d6181dc69 100644
> --- a/tools/virtiofsd/passthrough_seccomp.c
> +++ b/tools/virtiofsd/passthrough_seccomp.c
> @@ -108,6 +108,7 @@ static const int syscall_allowlist[] = {
> SCMP_SYS(set_robust_list),
> SCMP_SYS(setxattr),
> SCMP_SYS(symlinkat),
> + SCMP_SYS(syncfs),
> SCMP_SYS(time), /* Rarely needed, except on static builds */
> SCMP_SYS(tgkill),
> SCMP_SYS(unlinkat),
> --
> 2.34.1
>
> _______________________________________________
> Virtio-fs mailing list
> Virtio-fs at redhat.com
> https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/virtio-fs
>
>
--
German
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/virtio-fs/attachments/20220214/fcca67c2/attachment.htm>
More information about the Virtio-fs
mailing list