[Virtio-fs] [virtiofsd] Issue opened: performance gap between virtio-fs and virtio-blk in --cache=always mode

[virtiofs-bot at sinrega.org]

Hi team,
I've done some tests to virtio-fs and virtio-blk. The conditions are:
 1. same buffered read workload.
 2. --cache=always for virtiofs
The result is virtio-blk costs only half time to finish the job than virtio-fs, why is that in terms of they are both just memory access?(I do one extra test first to load the workload to memory)
---
https://gitlab.com/virtio-fs/virtiofsd/-/issues/66