[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: a glibc question?



On Fri, 6 Apr 2001, Tom Diehl wrote:

>Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2001 11:35:55 -0400 (EDT)
>From: Tom Diehl <tdiehl pil net>
>To: wolverine-list redhat com
>Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
>List-Id: A discussion group concerning the Wolverine release
>    <wolverine-list.redhat.com>
>Subject: a glibc question?
>
>Hi all,
>On another list I am on (Big Brother if anyone cares) it has been reported
>that the <time.h> header is no longer included in glibc. Was this changed
>for a reason or is bugzilla bate? People are getting compile failures on
>stuff that compiles fine on 7.0 because of this. So far the fix seems to
>be to use <sys/time.h> instead.

Yes, the proper solution is to repair the software that is
missing the time.h include.  There is no bug other than the
software being compiled.



-- 
Mike A. Harris                  Shipping/mailing address:
OS Systems Engineer             190 Pittsburgh Ave., Sault Ste. Marie,
Red Hat Inc.                    Ontario, Canada, P6C 5B3
http://www.redhat.com           Phone: (705)949-2136






[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]