Fwd: Re: Display is fuzzy with ATI radeon 9000 pro

[Rocio Alfonso Pita]

I found solution:
  https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114158

thanks for your help.
  rozio

----------  Mensaje reenviado  ----------

Subject: Re: Display is fuzzy with ATI radeon 9000 pro
Date: Jueves, 5 de Febrero de 2004 09:37
From: Rocio Alfonso Pita <rozio at mundo-r.com>
To: xfree86-list at redhat.com, Alex Deucher <agd5f at yahoo.com>

hello,

  ATI drivers with I'd probed are ATI-4.3.0-13.i386.tar.gz (from 4.2.0-14 I
test with all) of gatos.sf.net.

  yesterday I'd proved the follow:
- a knopix and with driver vesa image is correct.
- when I prove with my fedora (and RH 9) with vesa drivers, image is fuzzy
too.
- if I prove with ati drivers (from gatos) the X server don't start. I adjust
monitor frecuency, test with autoconfiguration, without second busID... all
fails.

  I think that exists anything in XFree86 programation on Red Hat (fedora)
that with my hardware configuration fails. I'd tested a screenshot of my
fuzzy image in my (little) win98 in the same computer and image is perfect
with that hardware.

  thanks and regards,
     rozio

A lo que comentaba Alex Deucher el Miércoles, 4 de Febrero de 2004 16:45:
> --- Rocio Alfonso Pita <rozio at mundo-r.com> wrote:
> > hello,
> >
> >    I have a problem with my ati videocard. The problem is that image
> > is
> > very fuzzy with configuration detected by fedora. If I download
> > latest
> > ati drivers, and I configure XF86Config with 2 device for videocard
> > with
> > buisID, I obtain this error:
> >
> > (WW) RADEON: No matching Device section for instance (BusID
> > PCI:1:0:1) found
> > (EE) RADEON(0): No valid mode found for this DFP/LCD
> > (EE) Screen(s) found, but none have a usable configuration.
> >
> > Fatal server error:
> > no screens found
>
> Do you mean the latest xfree86 radeon driver or the latest ati binary
> driver?  Also the secondary PCI id (PCI:1:0:1) is just a place holder
> for the windows drivers.  If you want to use singlehead or dualhead,
> you will need the primary PCI id (PCI:1:0:0) only. if you were only
> using the primary ID then you can ignore the warning.  I believe that
> was fixed in cvs (all secondary ID's were removed from the radeon
> driver so it wouldn't try and claim them).
>
> Alex
>
> >    I open a bug in bugzilla about fedora drivers for ati and
> > configuration detected. This is:
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114158
> >
> >    I hope that with yours help I can solve my problem.
> >
> >    Thanks and regards,
> >       rozio

-------------------------------------------------------