[zanata-bugs] [Bug 1193747] RFE: Glossary should have context and description fields

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1193747



--- Comment #2 from Ding-Yi Chen <dchen at redhat.com> ---
(In reply to Luke Brooker from comment #1)
> From looking at how translators use glossaries in other tools and how they
> basically ignore our glossary feature, I think we need to totally rethink
> how we do glossaries.

True.
They don't use our glossary feature because:
1. We don't provide project information and glossary definition.
2. Our glossary panel is too small for most of the translators.
   And spreadsheet program is good enough to give translators an overview of a
glossary.

> My first thought is we should have project and user based glossaries that
> can be turned on/off in the editor.

Given the usage pattern of translators, we need a tab or even maximum window to
show glossary. We may also offer auto complete in cell editor.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=DDEh26ohhC&a=cc_unsubscribe