[Devtools] openshift is way too permissive in the CDK/ADB

[Aaron Weitekamp]

On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 8:30 AM, Dusty Mabe <dusty at dustymabe.com> wrote:

>
>
> On 05/18/2016 07:18 AM, Aslak Knutsen wrote:
> > I think most teams at the Brno F2F were struggling with this. It works
> locally, but semi-obscure failures when pushed 'live'. And out of the 30 RH
> engineers there, none knew 100% or was able to dig up a doc that explained
> why and how to fix it...
> >
> > This is/will be a massive pain point moving from Dev to Production. The
> very least we need some very clear, simple guides on how to make it work.
>
> Yeah, I think a lot of people are going to be very frustrated by this.
> It took me over an hour to track down and that's only because I know a
> lot about how the CDK is set up. Others would probably never be able
> to figure it out.
>
> ​
For the "eval" use case we made the right choice. Dusty's question is about
the CDK use case. To my mind the CDK should add value to a
​n openshift eval environment. This is a great opportunity for the CDK to
provide tooling to address this ubiquitous problem. Mitch Harpur's ideas
around this months ago were spot-on: walk devs through a journey, educate
them, etc.

_______________________________________________
> Devtools mailing list
> Devtools at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/devtools
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/devtools/attachments/20160518/2e307f19/attachment.htm>