[edk2-devel] [PATCH v2 6/7] EmbeddedPkg: Fix DwEmmc SendCommand polling

Leif Lindholm leif.lindholm at linaro.org
Tue Jun 11 09:08:47 UTC 2019


On Tue, Jun 11, 2019 at 02:40:51AM +0000, Loh, Tien Hock wrote:
> Leif,
> 
> Since Haojian have a newer driver model that uses the
> NonDiscoverableDeviceDxe, I believe we should be moving to use the
> new driver.
>
> I'll try to test out the patches submitted by Haojian in the mean time. 
> Can you help review the patch? Thanks!

I can have another look at the patch, but I would really appreciate if
you could also review it please?

My problem is that I really don't have much understanding of SD/MMC
protocols.

/
    Leif

> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Loh, Tien Hock
> > Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2019 3:56 PM
> > To: Haojian Zhuang <haojian.zhuang at linaro.org>; Leif Lindholm
> > <leif.lindholm at linaro.org>
> > Cc: devel at edk2.groups.io; thloh85 at gmail.com; Ard Biesheuvel
> > <ard.biesheuvel at linaro.org>
> > Subject: RE: [PATCH v2 6/7] EmbeddedPkg: Fix DwEmmc SendCommand
> > polling
> > 
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Haojian Zhuang <haojian.zhuang at linaro.org>
> > > Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2019 3:06 PM
> > > To: Leif Lindholm <leif.lindholm at linaro.org>
> > > Cc: Loh, Tien Hock <tien.hock.loh at intel.com>; devel at edk2.groups.io;
> > > thloh85 at gmail.com; Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel at linaro.org>
> > > Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 6/7] EmbeddedPkg: Fix DwEmmc SendCommand
> > > polling
> > >
> > > On Tue, May 28, 2019 at 07:04:09PM +0100, Leif Lindholm wrote:
> > > > +Haojian,
> > > >
> > > > Haojian - since you are the original author, can you comment on the
> > > > delays? Are these silicon bug workarounds (so we need to add a Pcd),
> > > > or does these changes work on your platforms too?
> > >
> > > I'm not in the loop, so I missed the patch series.
> > >
> > > The patch series can't work on my platform for the eMMC. Although a
> > > variable is created to identify whether it's a SD or eMMC device, it
> > > doesn't identify the eMMC device by the right way. So the eMMC device
> > > isn't initialized successfully on my platform.
> > >
> > > 1. Since MMC framework could identify whether it's eMMC device or SD
> > > device, we need to make device driver gets this kind of information
> > > from the MMC framework. And we need to support multiple eMMC/SD
> > > instances in MMC framework.
> > 
> > Yeah my bad I didn't read through the SD/MMC specs on that. Now I check
> > the specs and you're right, the information should be read from MMC
> > framework.
> > 
> > >
> > > 2. I sent a patch series to support both eMMC device and SD device before.
> > > https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/28572
> > > &&
> > > https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/28615
> > > Maybe it's missed. Could you help to review that patch series?
> 
> Leif, can you help review the patch series? Since Haojian have moved the driver to NonDiscoverableDeviceDxe, I think that would be a more appropriate driver to be used going forward. Thanks!
> 
> > 
> > >
> > > Best Regards
> > > Haojian
> > >
> > > >
> > > > Regards,
> > > >
> > > > Leif
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, May 27, 2019 at 05:30:27PM +0800, tien.hock.loh at intel.com
> > > wrote:
> > > > > From: "Tien Hock, Loh" <tien.hock.loh at intel.com>
> > > > >
> > > > > Change SendCommand polling mode to remove unnecessary delay, and
> > > > > check for transfer done only when block data is to be read/write.
> > > > > This would also increase performance slightly.
> > > > >
> > > > > Signed-off-by: "Tien Hock, Loh" <tien.hock.loh at intel.com>
> > > > > Cc: Leif Lindholm <leif.lindholm at linaro.org>
> > > > > Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel at linaro.org>
> > > > > ---
> > > > >  EmbeddedPkg/Drivers/DwEmmcDxe/DwEmmcDxe.c | 43
> > > +++++++++++++++-----
> > > > >  1 file changed, 33 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> > > > >
> > > > > diff --git a/EmbeddedPkg/Drivers/DwEmmcDxe/DwEmmcDxe.c
> > > > > b/EmbeddedPkg/Drivers/DwEmmcDxe/DwEmmcDxe.c
> > > > > index c6c8e04917..b57833458f 100644
> > > > > --- a/EmbeddedPkg/Drivers/DwEmmcDxe/DwEmmcDxe.c
> > > > > +++ b/EmbeddedPkg/Drivers/DwEmmcDxe/DwEmmcDxe.c
> > > > > @@ -286,16 +286,13 @@ SendCommand (
> > > > >              DWEMMC_INT_RCRC | DWEMMC_INT_RE;
> > > > >    ErrMask |= DWEMMC_INT_DCRC | DWEMMC_INT_DRT |
> > > DWEMMC_INT_SBE;
> > > > >    do {
> > > > > -    MicroSecondDelay(500);
> > > > >      Data = MmioRead32 (DWEMMC_RINTSTS);
> > > > > -
> > > > > -    if (Data & ErrMask) {
> > > > > -      return EFI_DEVICE_ERROR;
> > > > > -    }
> > > > > -    if (Data & DWEMMC_INT_DTO) {     // Transfer Done
> > > > > -      break;
> > > > > -    }
> > > > >    } while (!(Data & DWEMMC_INT_CMD_DONE));
> > > > > +
> > > > > +  if (Data & ErrMask) {
> > > > > +    return EFI_DEVICE_ERROR;
> > > > > +  }
> > > > > +
> > > > >    return EFI_SUCCESS;
> > > > >  }
> > > > >
> > > > > @@ -550,8 +547,9 @@ DwEmmcReadBlockData (
> > > > >    )
> > > > >  {
> > > > >    EFI_STATUS  Status;
> > > > > -  UINT32      DescPages, CountPerPage, Count;
> > > > > +  UINT32      DescPages, CountPerPage, Count, ErrMask;
> > > > >    EFI_TPL     Tpl;
> > > > > +  UINTN Rintsts = 0;
> > > > >
> > > > >    Tpl = gBS->RaiseTPL (TPL_NOTIFY);
> > > > >
> > > > > @@ -574,6 +572,18 @@ DwEmmcReadBlockData (
> > > > >      DEBUG ((DEBUG_ERROR, "Failed to read data,
> > > mDwEmmcCommand:%x, mDwEmmcArgument:%x, Status:%r\n",
> > mDwEmmcCommand,
> > > mDwEmmcArgument, Status));
> > > > >      goto out;
> > > > >    }
> > > > > +
> > > > > +  while(!((MmioRead32(DWEMMC_RINTSTS) &
> > (DWEMMC_INT_DTO))))
> > > {
> > > > > +    Rintsts = MmioRead32 (DWEMMC_RINTSTS);  }  ErrMask =
> > > > > + DWEMMC_INT_EBE | DWEMMC_INT_HLE | DWEMMC_INT_RTO |
> > > > > +            DWEMMC_INT_RCRC | DWEMMC_INT_RE |
> > > DWEMMC_INT_DCRC |
> > > > > +            DWEMMC_INT_DRT | DWEMMC_INT_SBE;
> > > > > +
> > > > > +  if (Rintsts & ErrMask) {
> > > > > +    Status = EFI_DEVICE_ERROR;
> > > > > +    goto out;
> > > > > +  }
> > > > >  out:
> > > > >    // Restore Tpl
> > > > >    gBS->RestoreTPL (Tpl);
> > > > > @@ -589,8 +599,9 @@ DwEmmcWriteBlockData (
> > > > >    )
> > > > >  {
> > > > >    EFI_STATUS  Status;
> > > > > -  UINT32      DescPages, CountPerPage, Count;
> > > > > +  UINT32      DescPages, CountPerPage, Count, ErrMask;
> > > > >    EFI_TPL     Tpl;
> > > > > +  UINTN Rintsts = 0;
> > > > >
> > > > >    Tpl = gBS->RaiseTPL (TPL_NOTIFY);
> > > > >
> > > > > @@ -613,6 +624,18 @@ DwEmmcWriteBlockData (
> > > > >      DEBUG ((DEBUG_ERROR, "Failed to write data,
> > > mDwEmmcCommand:%x, mDwEmmcArgument:%x, Status:%r\n",
> > mDwEmmcCommand,
> > > mDwEmmcArgument, Status));
> > > > >      goto out;
> > > > >    }
> > > > > +
> > > > > +  while(!((MmioRead32(DWEMMC_RINTSTS) &
> > (DWEMMC_INT_DTO))))
> > > {
> > > > > +    Rintsts = MmioRead32 (DWEMMC_RINTSTS);  }  ErrMask =
> > > > > + DWEMMC_INT_EBE | DWEMMC_INT_HLE | DWEMMC_INT_RTO |
> > > > > +            DWEMMC_INT_RCRC | DWEMMC_INT_RE |
> > > DWEMMC_INT_DCRC |
> > > > > +            DWEMMC_INT_DRT | DWEMMC_INT_SBE;
> > > > > +
> > > > > +  if (Rintsts & ErrMask) {
> > > > > +    Status = EFI_DEVICE_ERROR;
> > > > > +    goto out;
> > > > > +  }
> > > > >  out:
> > > > >    // Restore Tpl
> > > > >    gBS->RestoreTPL (Tpl);
> > > > > --
> > > > > 2.19.0
> > > > >

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#42194): https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/42194
Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/31807965/1813853
Group Owner: devel+owner at edk2.groups.io
Unsubscribe: https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/unsub  [edk2-devel-archive at redhat.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-




More information about the edk2-devel-archive mailing list