[edk2-devel] [PATCH V7 1/1] OvmfPkg: Enable TDX in ResetVector

Yao, Jiewen jiewen.yao at intel.com
Thu Sep 23 11:39:48 UTC 2021


I strongly recommend to separate SEV and TDX in all context, if it is something SEV or TDX specific.
Then each file has clear ownership.
If it is something generic for both SEV and TDX, it can in one file. 

For example, SecPeiTempRam/SecPageTable can be in common file.
But SevSnpSecrets/GhcbBookkeeping should be in SEV file.

Thank you
Yao Jiewen

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel at redhat.com>
> Sent: Thursday, September 23, 2021 4:48 PM
> To: Xu, Min M <min.m.xu at intel.com>
> Cc: devel at edk2.groups.io; Ard Biesheuvel <ardb+tianocore at kernel.org>; Justen,
> Jordan L <jordan.l.justen at intel.com>; Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh at amd.com>;
> Erdem Aktas <erdemaktas at google.com>; James Bottomley
> <jejb at linux.ibm.com>; Yao, Jiewen <jiewen.yao at intel.com>; Tom Lendacky
> <thomas.lendacky at amd.com>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH V7 1/1] OvmfPkg: Enable TDX in ResetVector
> 
> On Thu, Sep 23, 2021 at 12:38:24AM +0000, Xu, Min M wrote:
> > On September 22, 2021 3:49 PM, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
> > >   Hi,
> > >
> > > > +%ifdef ARCH_X64
> > > > +;
> > > > +; TDX Metadata offset block
> > > > +;
> > > > +; TdxMetadata.asm is included in ARCH_X64 because Inte TDX is only ;
> > > > +available in ARCH_X64. Below block describes the offset of ;
> > > > +TdxMetadata block in Ovmf image ; ; GUID :
> > > > +e47a6535-984a-4798-865e-4685a7bf8ec2
> > > > +;
> > > > +tdxMetadataOffsetStart:
> > > > +    DD      tdxMetadataOffsetStart - TdxMetadataGuid - 16
> > > > +    DW      tdxMetadataOffsetEnd - tdxMetadataOffsetStart
> > > > +    DB      0x35, 0x65, 0x7a, 0xe4, 0x4a, 0x98, 0x98, 0x47
> > > > +    DB      0x86, 0x5e, 0x46, 0x85, 0xa7, 0xbf, 0x8e, 0xc2
> > > > +tdxMetadataOffsetEnd:
> > > > +
> > > > +%endif
> > >
> > > This should be switched to common ovmf metadata (see patches 4-7 of the
> > > SEV-SNP series).
> > >
> > > Min: please have a look at these patches.
> > >
> 
> > Hi, Gerd
> > I checked the patches 4-7 of the SEV-SNP series. The common
> > OvmfMetadata is designed for both SEV and TDX, right?
> 
> That is the idea, yes.
> 
> > If so, then it means the SEV and TDX metadata will be mixed in this
> > OvmfMetadata.
> 
> Yes.
> 
> > I am thinking there will always be different fields for
> > SEV and TDX. For example, SEV has PcdOvmfSecGhcbPageTable but TDX
> > doesn't need that page. If the common OvmfMetadata is consumed by
> > TDX-QEMU, then PcdOvmfSecGhcbPageTableBase will be initialized too.
> > That doesn't make sense.
> 
> We have different range types.  OVMF_* are the common areas.  SEV_* will
> be used by sev only, TDX_* will be used by tdx only.  TDX and SEV
> entries are allowed to overlap, i.e. PcdOvmfSecGhcbPageTableBase should
> have some SEV_* type for sev (I think this needs fixing in the series),
> and tdx can use the page for something else by adding an TDX_* entry for
> the same range.
> 
> > I am thinking that SEV and TDX can keep their own Metadata (in
> > separate files, SevMetadata.asm and TdxMetadata.asm) which are pointed
> > by the SEV or TDX offsets in the GUID-ed chain in ResetVector.
> 
> I'd very much prefer to have a single table to avoid duplication for the
> common memory areas and keep the reset vector small.
> 
> Having separate SevMetadata.asm + TdxMetadata.asm files (then have
> OvmfMetadata.asm include these two) is an option.  I think this isn't
> needed, we can also just group the entries in OvmfMetadata.asm.
> 
> > In this case, SEV and TDX can design their own metadata flexibly, for
> > example, the attribute, the item structure, add/remove/update the
> > items, etc.
> 
> Why have two ways to do the same thing?
> 
> take care,
>   Gerd



-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#81029): https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/81029
Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/85761661/1813853
Group Owner: devel+owner at edk2.groups.io
Unsubscribe: https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/unsub [edk2-devel-archive at redhat.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-






More information about the edk2-devel-archive mailing list